European Parliament decided that Chat Control 1.0 must stop
lemoncookiechip
552 points
23 comments
March 26, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 49.7ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- End of "Chat Control": EU parliament stops mass surveillance amarcheschi · 584 pts · March 26, 2026 · 67% similar
- Chat Control Vote in the EU to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats dinowars · 22 pts · March 11, 2026 · 65% similar
- Chat Control: EU Parliament said no to Big Tech mass surveillance of your chats iamnothere · 12 pts · March 15, 2026 · 63% similar
- Chat Control: How Governments and Tech Lobby Try to Overturn EU Parliament vrganj · 35 pts · March 25, 2026 · 62% similar
- End of "Chat Control": Paving the Way for Genuine Child Protection latexr · 13 pts · March 17, 2026 · 60% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
nickslaughter02
Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529609 > Despite today’s victory, further procedural steps by EU governments cannot be completely ruled out. Most of all, the trilogue negotiations on a permanent child protection regulation (Chat Control 2.0) are continuing under severe time pressure. There, too, EU governments continue to insist on their demand for “voluntary” indiscriminate Chat Control. > Furthermore, the next massive threat to digital civil liberties is already on the agenda: Next up in the ongoing trilogue, lawmakers will negotiate whether messenger and chat services, as well as app stores, will be legally obliged to implement age verification. This would require users to provide ID documents or submit to facial scans, effectively making anonymous communication impossible and severely endangering vulnerable groups such as whistleblowers and persecuted individuals.
freehorse
The linked tweet is a bit misleading. There were 2 votes, one for amending the existing proposal re: "unknown messages", and the other for the whole proposal itself. The screenshot in the tweet is about the amendment, which was less important than the fact than then the whole proposal was rejected. I think this article [0] discussed here [1] is much more informative, and I suggest merging the current comment thread there [1]. I am not sure of the logic of the amendment, as parties voted differently between proposals (eg left parties voted for the amendment and against the whole, and EPP voted against both, S&D voted in favour of both). In any case, one vote difference for the amendment is not really the point, the actual vote for the whole is what mattered, and this gained a more clear majority against chat control [2]. Not sure if this is higher because it is more "clickbait" (chat control 1.0) or what, but it is a single tweet with a screenshot and no context, imho HN can do better than this. [0] https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/end-of-chat-control-eu-parl... [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529609 [2] https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189270
ChrisArchitect
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529609