A blueprint for democratic governance of frontier AI
tmp10423288442
15 points
3 comments
June 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 121.1ms across 10,813 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- FrontierCode streamer45 · 141 pts · June 08, 2026 · 58% similar
- Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era Ryan5453 · 1107 pts · April 07, 2026 · 57% similar
- The left-wing case for AI nsavage · 15 pts · May 10, 2026 · 56% similar
- Today's Frontier AI companies will never exceed the AI capability frontier again williamtrask · 24 pts · June 15, 2026 · 56% similar
- The other half of AI safety sofiaqt · 63 pts · May 14, 2026 · 56% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
SilverElfin
It’s a blueprint for regulatory capture, something both OpenAI and Anthropic need, in order to stay relevant. The actual doc linked in there talks about increasing the power of the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI), and having mandatory evaluations for “frontier” technology. The doc makes no mention of open source AI, privacy, freedom, or things like that. Anthropic and OpenAI have no moats. All they can do is use fear and control to create moats.
andrewstuart
The less OpenAI says out loud the better for everyone including themselves.
ls612
The cattle classes can’t be permitted to have intelligence that isn’t controlled by and reporting to the ruling class.