Securing the Future of AI Agents
falcor84
14 points
3 comments
June 18, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 504.8ms across 15,510 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- How We Broke Top AI Agent Benchmarks: And What Comes Next Anon84 · 315 pts · April 11, 2026 · 64% similar
- The other half of AI safety sofiaqt · 63 pts · May 14, 2026 · 64% similar
- Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era Ryan5453 · 1107 pts · April 07, 2026 · 64% similar
- Google's Beyond Zero: Enterprise Security for the AI Era jordigg · 148 pts · July 28, 2026 · 63% similar
- Who manages the agents? GavCo · 71 pts · July 11, 2026 · 62% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
falcor84
> It is important to note that our data shows the majority of flagged events do not stem from adversarial intent I didn't find this to be sufficiently reassuring. They then link to this paper [0], which I haven't yet read, but from quick skimming, the AI "sabotage" they investigated looks scary. But I am very glad that they're taking the initiative in studying this. [0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.30322
skybrian
This is vague, but I think the idea is to have a lot more surveillance of what AI agents are doing. And since the logs are boring, using AI to check the logs. Will this work? One thing it has going for it is that for an LLM, there is no such thing as loyalty. It will rat itself out because there’s no concept of self. On the other hand, there might be more subtle forms of contagion.