US Supreme Court drug users cannot be prohibited from firearms [pdf]
agensaequivocum
23 points
47 comments
June 18, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 111.0ms across 10,996 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- US Supreme Court limits ban on gun ownership by marijuana users helterskelter · 39 pts · June 18, 2026 · 75% similar
- Court Rules 2nd Amendment Covers Firearms Parts Good News Those Who Build Guns Bender · 107 pts · April 29, 2026 · 52% similar
- Supreme Court rejects Sony's attempt to kick music pirates off the Internet isaacfrond · 23 pts · March 26, 2026 · 47% similar
- US Department of Justice has officially reclassified cannabis as less dangerous kaycebasques · 153 pts · April 23, 2026 · 44% similar
- US Supreme Court reviews police use of cell location data unethical_ban · 237 pts · April 27, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
SilverElfin
They also need to invalidate, with jail time for legislators and governors, all the flagrantly unconstitutional gun control laws in blue states. A constitutional right is a constitutional right.
avalys
Nice to see a unanimous decision on a (by most appearances) controversial topic like this.
thmsths
Looking at the first page, the circumstances surrounding the indictment are infuriating. I thought that search warrants had to be specific to avoid just that kind of fishing expedition. The initial warrant was for terrorism related charges, it seems they found no evidence of it. How come they can then turn around and go for other charges?
rolph
someone being a user of a drug, doesnt mean they lose any right to keep and bear a firearm as soon as they start using in perpetuity since, "once a user always a user" a responsible person should realize they violate more than they vindicate by getting HAF and taking potshots at hallucination delusions and illusions. bare minimum, put the guns away, for boilerplate in a timelocked safe, until you are on level cognition again. removing someones right to effective self defense, permanently in complement to a temporary condition is disingenuous considering alcohol use is somehow not a permanently disqualifying condition vs "drug" use being ineffable impairment.