Supreme Court restricts use of geofence warrants
CharlesW
25 points
9 comments
June 29, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 872.6ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitutional protections cdrnsf · 503 pts · June 29, 2026 · 82% similar
- US Supreme Court reviews police use of cell location data unethical_ban · 237 pts · April 27, 2026 · 74% similar
- Supreme Court rules privacy protections apply to cellphone location history 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 22 pts · July 03, 2026 · 66% similar
- The Supreme Court Just Lit a Fuse Under Flock's License Plate Camera Empire bilsbie · 103 pts · July 06, 2026 · 53% similar
- US Supreme Court limits ban on gun ownership by marijuana users helterskelter · 39 pts · June 18, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
DivingForGold
This data sure would have helped identify who stole >$1,000 worth of copper wiring from my company in a very difficult hillside area where few would have had any business in that area, late at night. Of course the crooks would have had to have android cellphones switched on and on their persons. Perhaps this will lead to private security firms having devices similar to "stingers' (cell-site simulator or IMSI catcher) on site at high risk construction sites to gather data 24/7, the data only to be given to police in case of a crime.
iamnothere
Great news! Lots of small wins lately, people who care about privacy should feel encouraged and energized. Victory isn’t impossible. Keep pushing for the big wins.
smalltorch
This is good and begs the question; why can the police make broad searches on flock systems right now on anybody who may have been in the vicinity of a crime that took place without warrants? It's the same thing
axus
"... the Court carefully set the stage for its planned performance: striking a pose as a great champion of privacy in the digital age. I cannot support this irresponsible escapade". Justices Alito and Thomas finding personal liberty "irresponsible", classic.
ChrisArchitect
Some more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720924