UK Government unveils rules to end subscription traps
_____k
25 points
6 comments
April 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 48.9ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- New laws to make it easier to cancel subscriptions and get refunds chrisjj · 150 pts · April 02, 2026 · 61% similar
- The Australian government has announced gambling advertising reforms gostsamo · 112 pts · April 02, 2026 · 47% similar
- UK MPs give ministers powers to restrict Internet for under 18s robtherobber · 79 pts · March 11, 2026 · 46% similar
- 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches mosura · 325 pts · March 19, 2026 · 42% similar
- UK to Allow "Plug in" Solar edent · 22 pts · March 15, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
another-dave
> Ensure that for contracts covered by the new rules, consumers have a14 day period after a trial or 12 month+ contract auto-renews to cancel and receive a full or proportionate refund. This sounds great, but think a "gold standard" in good UX practice (whether or not needs to be law, up for debate) would be that you're not charged for your subscription until first use, either after the free trial end or renewal. So if my Netflix membership tick over, when I go to watch a new episode then it tells me "your membership is expired; accessing now is accepting renewal at £x/year. Continue?" > Charitable memberships: Certain memberships of charitable, cultural and heritage organisations will be excluded from the new rules given the unique role they have in preserving and opening up access to the nation’s history, landscapes, and cultural collections. Hmm, in my opinion charities are the worst for bad practices here and shouldn't be given a carve out. They should be the last people who need it, too. If I was genuinely happy that my money is going to Cancer Research and they're spending it wisely, why would they be worried about it?
graemep
its not enough. We need things like data portability.
filiphillesland
The charitable carve-out is the most interesting part of this. In practice, charities rely heavily on passive renewals from donors who forgot they signed up years ago. That's not malicious in the same way a dark pattern gym membership is, but the effect on the donor is identical. Hard to justify the exemption on principle even if the motivation is sympathetic.