The tyranny of single page apps
speckx
13 points
3 comments
May 18, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 82.9ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- I'm done making desktop applications (2009) claxo · 159 pts · April 24, 2026 · 54% similar
- The Age of Snarky UI sondr3 · 30 pts · April 16, 2026 · 52% similar
- Apple's intentional crippling of Mobile Safari xd1936 · 169 pts · March 22, 2026 · 49% similar
- So you want to write an “app” (2025) jmusall · 107 pts · March 09, 2026 · 48% similar
- What if the browser built the UI for you? jonnonz · 22 pts · April 05, 2026 · 48% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
paulddraper
> And of course if you're using React, obviously you want to use Tailwind CSS, right? Ok, you can certainly choose to use SASS or LESS if you seriously want to, but CSS post processors are all the rage these days. Or CSS Modules [1]. It's supported OOTB by virtually every CSS bundler: * Webpack (css-loader) * Rollup (rollup-plugin-postcss) * Vite * Parcel * Rspack * esbuild * Turbopack It's just vanilla CSS -- classes, pseudo-classes, media queries, etc -- with only two tweaks: 1. local scoping (and exporting scoped names to JS) 2. class inheritance It's very easy to use, and stays very close to vanilla CSS. [1] https://github.com/css-modules/css-modules
haitchfive
I don't understand what's the new contention. You are a leftie. Okay, so? ReactJS only pays off at Facebook scale. Corporate front-end development is overengineered. Not exactly a secret. Any other news?
ethanplant
I'm not quite sure what being a leftie has to do with the point you're making. This isn't really a political point and more the valid (though not particularly novel) view that "most websites are overcomplicated". > Writing the simplest of websites requires a ton of tooling now. Meanwhile my website personal website is nothing but markdown files that get rendered into static HTML with a little bit of CSS. You really don't need a massive JS framework for a simple website.