Splash-free urinals: Design through physics and differential equations
thunderbong
17 points
5 comments
September 04, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 54.1ms across 5,564 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Theory of Fluids Enters the 21st Century librasteve · 28 pts · August 17, 2026 · 50% similar
- 'Stunning' percolation proof solves decades-old puzzle about phase transitions tzury · 60 pts · August 31, 2026 · 47% similar
- Restroom Archive jcalx · 58 pts · September 01, 2026 · 41% similar
- The paradox of diffusion distillation (2024) peter_d_sherman · 16 pts · September 03, 2026 · 41% similar
- Why Are Rivers So Mathematical? bookofjoe · 13 pts · August 13, 2026 · 40% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
lern_too_spel
Previously discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43668957
mistyvales
Larry David approved?
readme
I'm honestly passionate about this topic. For a while, around the time that urinals started to appear without water, I dealt with some serious splashback issues. I forget when I started aiming for the back of the urinal. I'm assuming that's the deflection angle the paper discusses. At one point I realized, I was sometimes getting some pretty bad splashback. Perhaps because I stood close to the urinal. So I asked a colleague. He said he aims for the hole, and was confused why anyone would piss on the back of the urinal. I started doing that -- problem solved. I am for a direct hit, every time. The problem is that some urinals have a protector over the hole to prevent really smart people and children from putting paper towels in there. That thing is dome shaped, and multiplexes the stream like a lawn sprinker. All of this, would not be necessary, if there were water at the bottom of the urinal.
gabrielsroka
Domain name checks out.
LorenPechtel
The basic problem is that making the angle low makes the urinal take up more space. Businesses don't like that.