Researchers who use hallucinated references to face ArXiv ban
gnabgib
17 points
3 comments
May 19, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 87.8ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references gjuggler · 431 pts · May 14, 2026 · 77% similar
- Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition Is a Way Forward gmays · 16 pts · May 08, 2026 · 53% similar
- Hallucination Is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models drob518 · 12 pts · May 04, 2026 · 51% similar
- Show HN: Hallucinopedia bstrama · 187 pts · May 06, 2026 · 49% similar
- Banned by Anthropic? gck1 · 92 pts · April 19, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
OsrsNeedsf2P
Sounds reasonable to me. They're also cracking down on other types of hallucinations in articles.
wavemode
Discussed last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140922
SOLAR_FIELDS
> But not everyone is convinced that such measures are the right approach. Natalie Khalil, the founder of Reviewer 3, a platform run from in San Francisco, California, that uses AI to help researchers to conduct peer review, argues that arXiv is treating the symptom, not the root cause. “If a researcher is banned from arXiv, they will still do research, just elsewhere,” she notes. Notably, the commenter offers up no viable alternative solution