Quantum frontiers may be closer than they appear
OJFord
17 points
3 comments
March 29, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 36.2ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Safeguarding cryptocurrency by disclosing quantum vulnerabilities responsibly madars · 30 pts · March 31, 2026 · 61% similar
- Quantum computer researchers: Bitcoin encryption breakable in a few years croes · 15 pts · April 03, 2026 · 58% similar
- Quantum computing bombshells that are not April Fools Strilanc · 103 pts · April 02, 2026 · 58% similar
- Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies Against Quantum Vulnerabilities [pdf] jandrewrogers · 41 pts · March 31, 2026 · 51% similar
- Physicists developing a quantum computer that’s entirely open source tzury · 71 pts · March 02, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
hammock
If it’s three years away that means state-level actor(s) has it now. I wonder what a quantum backdoor would look like.
mmmBacon
We are still in a regime where the growth of logical qubits is far below the point of any practical computing utility let alone at a level capable of breaking existing codes. While it’s correct to be proactive at the security end, if you take the current rate of improvement in logical qubits and project it forward you’ll get something beyond 2040. I built a probabilistic model of logical qubit improvement and the median ends up being further out (probably should publish this somewhere). I’d like to point out that I’m not purely negative; I was surprised to calculate we can make enough He-II to make it all go! Of course such a model cannot predict a fundamental breakthrough nor can it predict whether there is some kind of fundamental limit to the size of such a quantum system before we have coherence collapse. This is an interesting question for quantum mechanics however. In summary, quantum computing feels analogous to fusion, a technology that’s always 20 years away. Oh and don’t get me started on AGI. Lol.