Quantum computing bombshells that are not April Fools
Strilanc
103 points
31 comments
April 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 55.2ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Quantum frontiers may be closer than they appear OJFord · 17 pts · March 29, 2026 · 58% similar
- Physicists developing a quantum computer that’s entirely open source tzury · 71 pts · March 02, 2026 · 58% similar
- Safeguarding cryptocurrency by disclosing quantum vulnerabilities responsibly madars · 30 pts · March 31, 2026 · 56% similar
- Quantum computer researchers: Bitcoin encryption breakable in a few years croes · 15 pts · April 03, 2026 · 55% similar
- The JVG algorithm could break RSA-2048 encryption with fewer than 5k qubits giuliomagnifico · 12 pts · March 04, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
ChrisArchitect
Related: Discussion on the Google one, Safeguarding cryptocurrency by disclosing quantum vulnerabilities responsibly https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582418
tombert
Here's hoping that my stock for D-Wave ends up being worth something. Quantum computing seems super cool, but I've been a little skeptical of it actually ever yielding anything useful. I would love to be wrong, it seems neat, and I have read through a few books on the subject and played with simulators, so I'm not completely talking out of my ass here, but quantum as a whole has kind of felt like vaporware to me. As I said, I have stock in D-Wave, obviously it would be in my best interest for quantum to end up as cool as it seems.
pmarreck
Can quantum computing do even basic math yet? I think this was the holdup. Or perhaps I'm missing the point.
amluto
One thing I find rather amazing about all of this is the degree to which the Bitcoin community has tried, for years, to claim that quantum computers will be another other than a complete break. Sure, it takes a pretty nice quantum computer or a pretty good algorithm or a degree of malice on the part of miners to break pay-to-script-hash if your wallet has the right properties, but that seems like a pretty weak excuse for the fact that the entire scheme is broken, completely, by QC . Does there even exist a credible post-quantum proof protocol that could be used to “rescue” P2SH wallets?
socketcluster
Maybe it's a good time to start promoting my 5 year old, lightweight, hand-crafted, battle-tested, quantum-resistant blockchain: https://capitalisk.com/ It's about 5000 lines of custom code. Crypto signature library written from scratch.
GeoSys
So does BTC need to hard fork? Good luck getting to a consensus again ...
freetonik
I worked at a quantum computing company that builds superconducting QC chips (so, not really applicable to one of the “bombshells” from the article). My team was designing the software stack which allows to control the QC, run quantum jobs/algorithms, and calibrate the parameters. I’ve made two attempts to explain the work we’ve been doing and to explain the current realistic state of the industry: 1. A talk at PyCon: https://youtu.be/tT1YLP5T71Y 2. A free ebook “ Quantum Computing For Software Engineers” https://leanpub.com/quantum-computing-for-software-engineers The company I left a few months ago is planning its IPO this year. Like almost all other quantum companies, it’s gonna be a SPAC merger, not a pure IPO. Those traded companies mentioned in the other comments are mostly SPACs as well.