Physicist Astrid Eichhorn is a leader in the field of asymptotic safety
tzury
116 points
16 comments
March 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 48.0ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- In Expanding de Sitter Space, Quantum Mechanics Gets More Elusive pseudolus · 30 pts · March 31, 2026 · 49% similar
- Are the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Beginning to Dissolve? wjb3 · 82 pts · March 01, 2026 · 48% similar
- Physicists developing a quantum computer that’s entirely open source tzury · 71 pts · March 02, 2026 · 46% similar
- Quantum computing bombshells that are not April Fools Strilanc · 103 pts · April 02, 2026 · 46% similar
- Quantum frontiers may be closer than they appear OJFord · 17 pts · March 29, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
MeteorMarc
Read on and see the retropredictions of top and bottom quark energies!
irishcoffee
TL;DR: scientists are still pursuing science. > Eichhorn and her colleagues are pursuing a different possibility. In 1976, Steven Weinberg, a theorist who would eventually earn a Nobel Prize, pointed out that if you zoomed in far enough, you might reach a place where the rules of physics would stop changing. New realms would stop appearing; the intensities of the forces would stabilize; and gravity would turn out to make perfect sense after all.
noslenwerdna
Asymptotic Safety also predicted the higgs mass (126 GeV vs the measured value of 125 GeV). https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0208 The trick is, at that time most of the possible mass range was excluded experimentally, so it is a bit less impressive. I'm not sure how much tuning went into it (possibly none)
user3939382
I see a spacetime with no time, only mass and energy.
taeric
The headline feels off. Which, fair, headline. But "seeing fractals" feels like a cheat of saying, things have a similarity as you change scale. This could be true even if you think things reduce to strings/loops/whatever. Such that contrasting fractals to strings feels off. Still a neat and fun article.