Meta's Muse appears to use an OpenAI model labeled muse-special
Aeroi
126 points
47 comments
September 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 88.3ms across 7,702 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent yks · 434 pts · September 08, 2026 · 75% similar
- Muse Spark 1.3 bvaldivielso · 497 pts · September 02, 2026 · 70% similar
- Muse Spark 1.1 ot · 349 pts · July 09, 2026 · 70% similar
- Meta’s Muse has a serious 0-day pavel_lishin · 117 pts · September 22, 2026 · 66% similar
- Introducing Muse Spark 1.3 scrlk · 64 pts · September 02, 2026 · 64% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
Aeroi
author here. I kept digging through the Muse filesystem after my first post hit the front page here this week. Going through my logs I found a background agent that used a model called azure/muse-special while building my website. I found this interesting and dug a little deeper. The transcript and daemon binary point to an OpenAI model running on Azure. Still unclear which one or why it was selected. The runtime also ships with an Anthropic client and a catalogue listing Claude, GPT and Kimi models. I didn’t observe Claude being used in my own sessions, but this is my Part 2 of exploring the Muse file system. original post: https://x.com/heypeterjames/status/2103545183400800746 pete at mouse dot dev
Tiberium
I don't really see evidence that it's an "OpenAI" model, the title is IMO very misleading.
GenerWork
I'm not sure I understand why they would route it to other models. It can't be that they don't have enough compute. Maybe worried that the answer from their own models would be bad? Doesn't really make sense, but I could be missing something.
6thbit
It'd be hilarious that meta chose to pay openai. If there was such a deal, would it come to light in any public/official filings?
manav
Muse 1.3 spark occasionally spits out Chinese character responses to me like internal instructions. “Go fast” or “Get help”…
sourcecodeplz
zuck wouldn't do this, he is too proud imho
sejje
I thought it was 1.3 spark. No?