Letterboxd Is Up for Sale, and A24, Sony and the New York Times Are Bidding

Computer0

I use https://movielens.org/ and it is ran by the University of Minnesota.

clayhacks

Is there an ATproto or activity pub version of letterboxd? I like A24, but not sure how much I trust Sony or the NYT to run it reasonably

535188B17C93743

Can't wait for the enshittification of Letterboxd. Dear God, don't let Amazon do what it did to Goodreads here.

DarkNova6

Amazing. So Imdb 2.0 has become Imdb 2.0.

rdmuser

Having such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big. Edit: I believe I made an error re the claim imdb changed the score of at least one amazon owned film. See replies for more info. Apologies!

mpalmer

Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?

ChrisArchitect

Referenced NYT piece (unlocked): https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/business/media/letterboxd... Related background on the state of growth there from a few months ago: The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463894

thrownaway561

so glad I move over to TMDB the other day. Letterboxd layout is the worst.

sajithdilshan

If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.

hotsalad

Heh, the name makes it sound like a daemon. service letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start

dgellow

Damn, that asking price is insane

reticulates

I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’etre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it. Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd “Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.” …?

kkotak

Why not $3B? or $30B, even?

kennywinker

America hasn’t had real antitrust law for >40 years. It should be impossible for a review site to be purchased by a company that makes things reviewed on that site. Reagan era neoliberalism defanged antitrust, and brought on the corpo-hellscape we live in today.