I rode Elon Musk's Vegas Loop, the worst transit system on Earth
doener
45 points
31 comments
June 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 96.1ms across 9,294 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Neighbors Say SF Tesla Supercharger Lot Has Become Urine Dumping Ground randycupertino · 23 pts · March 18, 2026 · 46% similar
- The SpaceX IPO is great for Elon Musk and terrible for you 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 20 pts · May 31, 2026 · 45% similar
- I went to America's worst national parks so you don't have to surprisetalk · 195 pts · April 13, 2026 · 43% similar
- The SpaceX IPO It's Worse Than You Think [video] ZeljkoS · 41 pts · May 21, 2026 · 43% similar
- Riding the D in Los Angeles: city hopes new subway stations will be game changer raybb · 19 pts · May 10, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (9 comments)
joshstrange
I haven't kept up with the "Loop" concept but I had heard it would use cars, not trains/similar which already felt stupid but the fact you had to wait for a car coming the other direction just feels beyond the pale. And that's before we get to the the "drivered" car. If ever there was a case where autonomous cars should excel, it's got to be this but instead we have human drivers still. So it's literally Lyft/Uber with extra steps, limited destinations, and the same speed.
HugoTea
> A quick check of Google Maps showed the route we were taking, on city streets, took 6 minutes. As we emerged into the sunshine at Westgate, I checked my timer. Six minutes. I’d saved zero minutes. Beautiful
HugoTea
If you think of the Loop system as a way of transporting people then it will obviously look insanely stupid. But if you consider what it really is - an easy way to sell Teslas to cities for no benefit, then it makes perfect sense.
Peregrine1
“I tried a prototype outside of its optimal use case and it was half baked.” Surprise surprise!
cornholio
It's interesting how Loop criticism has evolved over the years: initially, it was claimed Boring Co has no chance of duplicating or significantly improving on the speed and cost of state of the art used by tunneling companies, or that the entire concept is fundamentally impossible or cost-prohibitive to build. After building the first stations, it changed to capacity concerns or that it's not Hyperloop, an completely unrelated high speed concept. Now, after Loop demonstrated vehicle rates that would beat most light rail projects and many subway systems too - assuming they get adequate automated larger vehicles - the criticism seems to be that it's not build out yet to a significant size, or that it has minor usability quirks. I sure hope these people understand just how foolish that position risks to become if Boring Co continues good execution and build outs the entire system as planed.
ChrisArchitect
cleaned up url: https://www.sfgate.com/travel/article/vegas-loop-22280647.ph...
sligor
I never understood how running a car, even electric one, in such small tunnel was considered safe.
beardyw
I use the London tube (112 miles of it underground) quite often and it is the lines which cross the center which I use most often, and from what I can tell a lot of people do the same. The new east west Elizabeth Line is now heavily used.
duxup
This video gives a first hand experience that seems to cover everything: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPjODKUxV5g It looks like a project that they just gave up on ...