How AI is breaking the British state

decimalenough

https://archive.is/IDptA

decimalenough

> One step is to stop creating entitlements that are ripe for AI-fuelled claims. Britain’s Employment Rights Act and Renters’ Rights Act open avenues of legal challenge for workers and tenants. Not only are they misguided, but ministers put little thought into how they would burden the courts. Is the Economist seriously suggesting we should roll back workers and renters rights because AI makes it too easy for the average Joe to actually get those rights? > Rather than just handling locals’ objections, a new Ai-driven planning system could decide for itself whether a housing development meets a zoning code. Rather than processing benefits claims, it could devise personalised welfare interventions. And this sounds like it's going to work just grrrreat .

delichon

I have great confidence in the capacity of the British state to ignore any possible volume of petitions for the redress of grievances, and to carry on.

pessimizer

> Yet it threatens to become a tragedy of the commons. If the state is overwhelmed and cannot function, everyone loses. When 20th-century governments created broad rights, they had the noble ideal of making citizenship meaningful. The public would be heard in consultations, get information under transparency laws and win redress for maladministration from a panoply of ombudsmen, tribunals, commissioners and judges. But these analogue systems assumed that few people would have the time or temperament to pursue their rights to the bitter end; and that of those who did, few would have the money to pay for a lawyer. The Economist is angry because current processes were only supposed to supply the appearance of justice, but wear down anyone who wasn't a full time employee working on someone else's behalf.

m101

If the government is stupid enough to write law that it cannot enforce when applied by all citizens (and not only those with means), then we should welcome anything which will bring about the demise of those laws.

lowbloodsugar

The peasants have lawyers now?! No! Must be banned!

godwinson__4-8

How many PMs has Britain gone through in the past decade? As usual, not really sure blaming AI is a useful way to understand the problem. British politics has felt "broken" since at least Cameron's failed bet on Brexit.

nojs

The function of the bureaucracy in this context is a filter for effort. It naturally filters out people who don't care enough to battle through the bullshit, which is arguably quite an effective way to distribute limited resources to the public. In general, our economy relies a lot on these natural filters for effort. A company with a nice website doesn't necessarily mean the company is good, except historically it kind of does, because it's a proxy for effort (and budget), both of which correlate roughly with reputability and a good product. The same applies to well-written blog post: typically, a very good writer generally is also someone with something interesting to say, even though in theory the two things don't have to be connected. Similarly, the entire moat of many companies is that switching to a competitor is a lot of effort. AI is effectively sending the effort required to do any of these things to zero, which means all our existing implicit filters are going to stop working.

rcxdude

TBH these rights have been pretty easy to assert beforehand: I've told multiple friends complaining about their landlords what rights they do have and that in a lot of cases they can assert them by inaction (normally, not signing a contract that the landlord or rental agency is implying but not outright saying they need to sign, that would lock them into another long rental period), and they have generally just gone along with it anyway, because they don't want to rock the boat. Not knowing and not being bothered to assert them I think has always been the biggest barrier.