GitHub having issues [resolved]
Simpliplant
207 points
140 comments
March 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 42.0ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- GitHub is once again down MattIPv4 · 352 pts · March 24, 2026 · 75% similar
- Tell HN: GitHub Having Issues Sytten · 51 pts · March 03, 2026 · 71% similar
- GitHub Actions is shitting the bed again drcongo · 39 pts · March 05, 2026 · 71% similar
- GitHub appears to be struggling with measly three nines availability richtr · 446 pts · March 23, 2026 · 64% similar
- A GitHub Issue Title Compromised 4k Developer Machines edf13 · 368 pts · March 05, 2026 · 52% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
joecool1029
codeberg might be a little slower on git cli, but at least it's not becoming a weekly 'URL returned error: 500' situation...
joshrw
Happening very often lately
duckkg5
I would so very much love to see GitHub switch gears from building stuff like Copilot etc and focus on availability
cpfohl
I swear this is my fault. I can go weeks without doing infra work. Github does fine, I don't see any hiccups, status page is all green. But the day comes that I need to tweak a deploy flow, or update our testing infra and about halfway through the task I take the whole thing down. It's gotten to the point where when there's an outage I'm the first person people ask what I'm doing...and it's pretty dang consistent....
akoumjian
Is this related to Cloudflare? I'm getting cf-mitigated: challenge on openai API requests. https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/ https://status.openai.com/
garciasn
How reliable is githubstatus.com? I know that status pages are generally not updated until Leadership and/or PR has a chance to approve the changes; is that the case here? Our health check checks against githubstatus.com to verify 'why' there may be a GHA failure and reports it, e.g. Cannot run: repo clone failed — GitHub is reporting issues (Partial System Outage: 'Incident with Copilot and Actions'). No cached manifests available. But, if it's not updated, we get more generic responses. Are there better ways that you all employ (other than to not use GHA, you silly haters :-))
khaledh
GitHub has been shit lately. What the fuck is going on?
overshard
I've taken to hosting everything critical like this myself on a single system with Docker Compose with regular off premises backups and a restore process that I know works because I test it every 6 months. I can swap from local hosting to a VPS in 30 mins if I need to. It seems like the majority of large services like GitHub have had increasingly annoying downtime while I try to get work done. If you know what you're doing it's a false premise that you'll just have more issues with self hosting. If you don't know what you are doing it's becoming an increasingly good time to learn. I've had 4 years of continuous uptime on my services at this point. I still push to third parties like GitHub as yet another backup and see the occasional 500 and my workflow keeps chugging along. I've gotten old and grumpy and rather just do it myself.
cyberax
You know that it's bad when the status page doesn't have the availability stats anymore.
pothamk
What’s interesting about outages like this is how many things depend on GitHub now beyond just git hosting. CI pipelines, package registries, release automation, deployment triggers, webhooks — a lot of infrastructure quietly assumes GitHub is always available. When GitHub degrades, the blast radius is surprisingly large because it breaks entire build and release chains, not just repo browsing.
littlestymaar
In many companies I worked for, there were a bunch of infrastructure astronauts who made everything very complicated in the name of zero downtime and sold them to management as “downtime would kill pur credibility and our businesses ”, and then you have billion dollar companies everyone relies on (GitHub, Cloudflare) who have repeated downtime yet it doesn't seem to affect their business in any way.
banga
Only on days with a "y"...
m_w_
Seems like the xkcd [1] for internet infrastructure that was posted earlier [2] should have github somewhere on it, even if just for how often it breaks. Maybe it falls under "whatever microsoft is doing" [1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1p204nx/ac... [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47230704
zthrowaway
Microslop ruins everything it touches.
fsflover
Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47237018
yoyohello13
How many 9s is GitHub at now? 2?
granzymes
I have a bug bash in an hour and fixes that need to go in beforehand. So of course GitHub is down.
shykes
In moments like this, it's useful to have a "break glass" mode in your CI tooling: a way to run a production CI pipeline from scratch, when your production CI infrastructure is down. Otherwise, if your CI downtime coincides with other production downtime, you might find yourself with a "bricked" platform. I've seen it happen and it is not fun. It can be a pain to setup a break-glass, especially if you have a lot of legacy CI cruft to deal with. But it pays off in spades during outages. I'm biased because we (dagger.io) provide tooling that makes this break-glass setup easier, by decoupling the CI logic from CI infrastructure. But it doesn't matter what tools you use: just make sure you can run a bootstrap CI pipeline from your local machine. You'll thank me later.
Imustaskforhelp
Are we serious?
terminalbraid
I would prefer we have posts when github is not having issues to cut down on noise.