Five men control AI. Who should control them?
andsoitis
17 points
22 comments
April 16, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 58.3ms across 4,783 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- AI CEOs worry the government will nationalize AI MilnerRoute · 20 pts · March 08, 2026 · 61% similar
- Americans Recognize AI as a Wealth Inequality Machine, Polls Find randycupertino · 52 pts · March 18, 2026 · 56% similar
- Why are executives enamored with AI, but ICs aren't? johnjwang · 63 pts · March 27, 2026 · 56% similar
- Stanford report highlights growing disconnect between AI insiders and everyone ZeidJ · 233 pts · April 13, 2026 · 56% similar
- Tech CEOs suddenly love blaming AI for mass job cuts. Why? tartoran · 14 pts · March 30, 2026 · 55% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
saltyoldman
The countries that they're in already do via the law. No one else should "control" someone.
billfor
Clearly the Economist and their panel of experts.
gizmodo59
“Insider is supported by ANTHROPIC“ get their money and act like independent? What a joke
comrade1234
No Chinese? Guess they're no good at ai.
judahmeek
https://ai-2027.com does a solid job of demonstrating the existential risk of the singularity. If it is actually approaching, we need leaders who will give potential black swan events the severe caution they are due. I sure hope the theoretical timeline is compressed because the singularity under Donald Trump likely means that we're all dead due to misalignment.
xnx
Demis Hassabis is on their list? He reports to Sundar (who reports to Sergey Brin?)
danny_codes
lol bit of a stretch there, seeing as there are dozens of companies training LLMs. As training software and infrastructure matures plenty more entrants will enter the market. It’s not like this is a particularly challenging research field, just very expensive at the moment.