Extending single-minus amplitudes to gravitons
telotortium
15 points
14 comments
March 04, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 48.8ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Show HN: Run 500B+ Parameter LLMs Locally on a Mac Mini fatihturker · 11 pts · March 09, 2026 · 46% similar
- OpenAI Parameter Golf hmate9 · 11 pts · March 18, 2026 · 43% similar
- Non-trivial error in physics paper found via Lean leanexplorer · 21 pts · March 22, 2026 · 40% similar
- In Expanding de Sitter Space, Quantum Mechanics Gets More Elusive pseudolus · 30 pts · March 31, 2026 · 39% similar
- Quantization from the Ground Up samwho · 226 pts · March 25, 2026 · 39% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
behnamoh
I'm tired of these posts; LLMs are good for happy-path demos, that's it. And even then, their success rate depends on the prompter already knowing the answer! Literally any out-of-distribution project in which I used LLMs lead to catastrophic failure. The models can't "see" stuff outside their training data.
adampunk
That's one heck of a next token to predict.
micheles
As a former Theoretical Physicist, this result is remarkable. I myself I tried to use AI for calculations in Perturbative Quantum Field Theory and I was impressed. I agree with the authors: it looks like the future of Theoretical Physics would be more in verification and consistency checking of AI-assisted results rather than in manual calculations.