Maxproof

daquisu

"I thought it was interesting and a bit underappreciated that the fraction of gold medalists at the 2025 IMO (72/630 = 11.4%) is the highest it’s been since 1981. Crudely, IMO gold medals are awarded to the highest-scoring 1/12 of contestants.1 However, because scores are integers up to 42 and there’s no provision for tiebreaking, it’s possible for a lot of contestants to be tied around the threshold. In that case, either all of them get a gold medal or none do, and the fraction of gold medalists might deviate substantially from 1/12. That’s what happened this year: 46 contestants all won a gold medal by scoring exactly 35 points. In fact, bizarrely, 35 is the mode of the scores this year; the last time the modal score was a gold medal score was in 1994. And, of course, 35 is the same score claimed by AI systems from Google, OpenAI, and others." From https://blog.vero.site/post/imo-2025

pfannl

The real AGI test is apparently not solving the IMO, but getting caught in the same scoring traffic jam as 46 teenagers.

thierrydamiba

Is the harness more valuable than the weights?

minimaxir

not a good day to be named Max

korbonits

Proves the need for more formal verification :)

rapsacnz

How about "Proofmaxxing"