Everyone talks about AI agents. This is what one looks from the inside
pssah4
11 points
10 comments
August 14, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 50.4ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Show HN: AgentSight – eBPF observability for AI agents, no code changes forrestly · 15 pts · August 21, 2026 · 56% similar
- Who manages the agents? GavCo · 71 pts · July 11, 2026 · 56% similar
- The AI Aesthetic montroser · 252 pts · July 30, 2026 · 55% similar
- AI Agent – TRMNL joeyespo · 47 pts · July 21, 2026 · 54% similar
- Working with AI feels more like leadership than coding allenb · 292 pts · August 15, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
lexoj
Similarly, I've created a simple Pi extension [1] that allows you to summon your LLMs inline from your notes (obsidian or any text format) and it's able to apply any edits (via Pi edit tools) [1] https://github.com/piqoni/pi-piqo
meindnoch
actual title: What Vault Operator can do
terabytest
At this point, are we sharing these AI-written articles to make fun of how bad they are? Is there any substance left to discuss? > When the panel proposes a change to the file, the Änderungen prüfen modal opens first. This is in the first section. If they never bothered to proofread their article, how is it worth the time it takes to read it? I’m not being facetious. It’s becoming extremely hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. Every piece of software looks and reads like a homogenous pile of Claudisms. Even if the software in question is good, I immediately lose trust in the developer’s good faith when I see stuff like this.