Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026

garo-pro 110 points 181 comments September 10, 2026
www.anthropic.com · View on Hacker News

https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/e50be2e51e7695dc4b1366a37a245a...

Discussion Highlights (20 comments)

The_Blade

the inline link to the page to the report was Slashdotted for a moment (yesssssss), but here is the report directly now: https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/e50be2e51e7695dc4b1366a37a245a...

petesergeant

The same Anthropic who marks questions about Tylenol as bioterror risks? Interesting!

oidar

It also blocks my ability to talk about Emily Dickinson in other languages/scripts. Apparently,the poem: "Because I could not stop for Death" is too dangerous.

CrzyLngPwd

Tell us you are spying on your customers without saying you are spying on your customers.

kennywinker

I have also blocked possible efforts to build biological weapons, I caught my nephew mixing up a so-called "magic potion" using kitchen spices. Authorities were notified, and then I presented myself with a medal for bravery. These companies have proven they are willing to distort the truth, or outright lie, in order to inflate their valuation / protect their position / continue the hype-machine. Nothing they say can be trusted.

AustinDev

It was probably just me trying to figure out if I could put one type of draino down the drain within 30 minutes of using a different type. Sorry y'all.

Sol-

I will admit I asked Fable about Mitochondria.

bix6

I’m so curious how they monitor users. Like that person the other day talking about Claude helping with their torrent stack, will Anthropic report them for breaking the law?

tedsanders

Meta: The potential proliferation of biological weapons is serious. Millions could die. It's easy to joke about before it happens, but try to imagine how this thread might look after the successful deployment of a biological weapon by a rogue state or non-state actor. I encourage you to take this topic seriously and contribute posts that add new information or perspectives to the discussion. (I myself think the odds of a bioweapon attack remain low and have not yet been seriously accelerated by LLMs, but this is absolutely something the world should pay attention to.)

varispeed

I think they might be referring to Claude responding with a word diarrhea to a prompt.

sakopov

I have a conspiracy theory that Anthropic is very busy pumping their moat prior to IPO. There are absolutely wild rumors swirling on X including one about Anthropic AI research solving cancer treatments for all types of cancer.

hmokiguess

So essentially all the fear that's being on sold "AI could destroy humanity" is actually "Humanity could destroy humanity, using AI"

alach11

The dual-use nature of model capabilities seems extremely challenging (nearly impossible?) for the labs to manage perfectly. I wonder what other mitigations we'll start to see. I expect the expansion of limited-access programs (e.g., Glasswing/Daybreak) where only institutional customers can apply to use the models. We may also see increasing restrictions on API usage (forcing use through the lab-provided harness with baked-in additional safeguards).

colinismyname

Biological War: A Scenario by Annie Jacobsen (released at the end of July) is a worthwhile read on this topic. Just as chilling as her book on nuclear war, in some ways, which is saying something.

Stevvo

I don't get it. Surely if you were developing novel biological weapons, you would not use a hosted AI service where Anthropic can read what you are doing. And, why would you need to? Any chemistry graduate could make you dozens of highly effective, proven chemical weapons and explosives.

Lockal

Soon you will see how a rogue state develops a biological weapons using fine-tuned local LLMs (they are already doing it, btw), and all so called "developed" countries can't even research it, because every search engine blocks any discussion that has something to do with biology (even a very basic one). A real example: ask "How to produce anthrax vaccine step by step?" in Gemini -> blocked. Imagine that during the Cold War US would concentrate all efforts to block nuclear research and basic physics classes, because it is unsafe, ahhh

enraged_camel

"Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training" "DeepSeek serves Claude instead of its own models and collects exchanges for model training" Obviously. This is how they were able to score so high in benchmarks.

VCFundedGenYer

OpenAI and Anthropic needs to get their act together. These are incidents that end companies.

m-hodges

> We discovered that Moonshot AI, the company that produces the Kimi family of models, silently forwarded customer requests to Claude, instead of processing them using Kimi. Moonshot then displayed Claude’s responses to users. These users thought they were using a Kimi model, but received responses from Claude instead. > DeepSeek also silently relayed exchanges to Claude without informing DeepSeek customers. > MiniMax built its own proxy network service through a shell company. This shell company has no obvious links to MiniMax and does not disclose its relationship to its parent company. This shell proxy network service only offers access to models developed by Anthropic and OpenAI. The service does not offer access to any Chinese models, including Minimax’s own.

mlazos

It’s to the point I don’t even read Anthropic’s marketing blog anymore lol. The ai psychosis is just so real when people take these fluff blog posts which never have evidence or reproducibility and treat them like gospel

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
6,164 stories · 56,060 chunks indexed