Anthropic discloses fourth AI hacking incident missed in earlier review
accountinhn
11 points
6 comments
September 10, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 77.8ms across 6,054 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic says Claude hacked three companies during tests nerder92 · 15 pts · July 31, 2026 · 80% similar
- Anthropic AI Models Hacked Three Companies During Tests bmulholland · 24 pts · July 30, 2026 · 71% similar
- Anthropic admits AI 'not perfectly aligned' with human values fittingopposite · 11 pts · September 01, 2026 · 66% similar
- Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations surprisetalk · 154 pts · July 30, 2026 · 63% similar
- OpenAI agents hijacked German website in previously undisclosed AI breakout negura · 93 pts · September 04, 2026 · 61% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
mdspan
> The incidents stemmed from a mistake that inadvertently gave the models access to the open internet. Why does it seem like every AI company has difficulties constructing a proper sandbox? Is there a fundamental constraint when designing sandboxes specifically for an LLM that prevents them from using established tools?
usernomdeguerre
>The company said in a blog post the incident involved an early version of Claude Opus 4.6. It said it had notified all the affected parties but did not disclose more details. Wild that they can break the law, disclose it happened, but not involve any law enforcement at all. If cybersecurity events entail disclosures then the perpetrator should carry more burden if they intend to continue doing business. Also here's the actual post from Anthropic: https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-cybe...