Comparing Objective Caml and Standard ML
lambertsimnel
14 points
2 comments
May 21, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 84.1ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Lambda Calculus Benchmark for AI marvinborner · 135 pts · April 25, 2026 · 49% similar
- A new C++ back end for ocamlc glittershark · 146 pts · April 01, 2026 · 48% similar
- Idiomatic Lisp and the Nbody Benchmark signa11 · 22 pts · April 03, 2026 · 48% similar
- McCLIM 1.0 – a GUI toolkit for Common Lisp slyrus · 27 pts · May 05, 2026 · 46% similar
- A Programmer's Guide to Common Lisp jellinek · 19 pts · May 01, 2026 · 46% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
bonesss
Really nice, and evenhanded, breakdown. I think OCaml is slept on in the LLM-hype discussion as it allows for very high level human readable abstractions and specifications, and feel all the ML inspired languages might be due for a resurgence of popularity. Also a bit funny to monitor my own reactions as a spoiled F# dev, chunk by chunk, oscillating between “ wow, that’s great I want to use that always ” and “ ew, yuck ” for both languages. The grass is always greener, but also that which I’ve already nitpicked has fewer nits to pick, apparently.
mcc1ane
(2020) at best