Chrome is looking to permanently drop MV2 extension
d3Xt3r
390 points
398 comments
June 10, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 108.2ms across 10,094 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Chrome looks set to ship an LLM Prompt API to the web. We oppose this API Vinnl · 23 pts · April 30, 2026 · 53% similar
- WebMCP is available for early preview andsoitis · 233 pts · March 01, 2026 · 51% similar
- Mozilla's opposition to Chrome's Prompt API jaffathecake · 607 pts · April 30, 2026 · 50% similar
- Google is discontinuing its free web search index for developers hmokiguess · 48 pts · May 04, 2026 · 48% similar
- Claude Opus wrote a Chrome exploit for $2,283 Mohansrk · 18 pts · April 18, 2026 · 48% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
ggm
Does Brave track or does Brave fork on this?
dotcoma
Why are people on HN still using Chrome? (or Edge, or Opera…)
rwmj
Surprised they still have this page on their site: > https://about.google/company-info/philosophy/ > 1. Focus on the user and all else will follow. > 6. You can make money without doing evil.
itskamran
This feels more like a gradual tightening of extension APIs under Manifest V3 than a sudden “kill switch.” uBlock isn’t going away, but its capabilities are definitely being reshaped...
grishka
I wonder what will Vivaldi do. They say that their built-in content blocker is "good enough" that you supposedly don't need uBO (I very much disagree) but they also keep MV2 extensions working to this day.
userbinator
IMHO it's quite brave that a Google employee working in that area would let his real name be published, and an illuminating view of how they (don't) think.
bronlund
People still using that POS? :)
damnitbuilds
Boycott evil companies.
chinathrow
Look, we're having a good time on Firefox since November 9, 2004. Come join us!
geysersam
Finally Firefox will get a 30% usage share!
HerbManic
Just remember that Google is essentially an advertising company and that they were always going to squeeze this opening closed as soon as they could get away with it. I do fear for a future were even Firefox ends up caving in. Ladybird browser might be our only hope until something legal comes along to block functionality.
Balinares
AdGuard MV3 works fine. Still switch to FF if you can, more diversity in the ecosystem benefits everyone.
totetsu
uBo is the only reason I find browsing the web at all tolerable anymore. As a test I turned it off to view this article and almost crashed my browser with a dozen auto play video ads This would mean I would find the energy to get over anything that is holding me on chrome, like saved passwords etc.
topsykrates
I have been using UBlock Origin Lite on Chrome for a while, and while it's not perfect and needs a bit of manual tweaking here and there, it's been mostly good for me
TiredOfLife
uBlock Origin lite exists. And in couple years usage I see no difference from non lite version.
nullbio
The only reason I use Chrome is because its dev tools are better, and for whatever reason, webgl wigs out on Ubuntu 26.04 in Firefox. It's mostly the lag issue though...
jon_adler
Yet another reason to also perform ad blocking at the network level (e.g. DNS). I’ve found AdGuard Home very easy to maintain. Using Firefox and Orion browsers too.
danslo
>from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version In what way? I've never noticed a difference.
Stevvo
uBlock Origin Lite gives an identical browsing experience, ad-free. What is all the fuss about?
RockstarSprain
AdGuard works fine for me, on YouTube as well.