California regulator confirms Tesla is not operating autonomous vehicle service
Bender
20 points
1 comment
March 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 31.9ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Tesla faces wider probe of self-driving feature 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 12 pts · March 23, 2026 · 56% similar
- My Self-Driving Car Crash – The Tesla was driving perfectly–until it wasn't ForHackernews · 33 pts · March 17, 2026 · 51% similar
- Tesla: Failure of the FSD's degradation detection system [pdf] doener · 179 pts · March 19, 2026 · 49% similar
- Tesla opens its first Megacharger station to Semi customers in California mattas · 11 pts · March 09, 2026 · 47% similar
- xAI loses bid to halt California AI data disclosure law consumer451 · 25 pts · March 07, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
FireBeyond
> No safety data, no reporting, no oversight: the classification has significant consequences for transparency. The CPUC collects detailed per-trip data from actual AV operators — including location data, passenger data, vehicle miles traveled, idling time, and “stoppage events” (instances where a vehicle is stuck for more than two minutes or requires remote intervention). This data is published in quarterly reports available to the public. > None of that applies to Tesla. Shocking that Tesla, who Musk claims, and Tesla-stans, here and elsewhere claim to be the "most transparent" company re self-driving choose a license that barely makes any sense (limousine/chauffeur car permitting) for anything to do with autonomous driving for anything other than a complete lack of transparency and reporting on vehicle events.