California regulator confirms Tesla is not operating autonomous vehicle service
Bender
20 points
1 comment
March 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 90.3ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Tesla faces wider probe of self-driving feature 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 12 pts · March 23, 2026 · 56% similar
- Tesla concealed fatal accidents to continue testing autonomous driving doener · 313 pts · April 20, 2026 · 55% similar
- Car Owners Are Revolting over Tesla's Self-Driving Promises JumpCrisscross · 36 pts · April 20, 2026 · 54% similar
- California Police Can Start Ticketing Driverless Cars reaperducer · 15 pts · May 01, 2026 · 54% similar
- Tesla reveals two Robotaxi crashes involving teleoperators Brajeshwar · 55 pts · May 16, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
FireBeyond
> No safety data, no reporting, no oversight: the classification has significant consequences for transparency. The CPUC collects detailed per-trip data from actual AV operators — including location data, passenger data, vehicle miles traveled, idling time, and “stoppage events” (instances where a vehicle is stuck for more than two minutes or requires remote intervention). This data is published in quarterly reports available to the public. > None of that applies to Tesla. Shocking that Tesla, who Musk claims, and Tesla-stans, here and elsewhere claim to be the "most transparent" company re self-driving choose a license that barely makes any sense (limousine/chauffeur car permitting) for anything to do with autonomous driving for anything other than a complete lack of transparency and reporting on vehicle events.