Automatic Textbook Formalization
tzury
34 points
12 comments
April 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 52.3ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- 130k Lines of Formal Topology: Simple and Cheap Autoformalization for Everyone? PaulHoule · 21 pts · March 03, 2026 · 51% similar
- MIT tech review: OpenAI is Building an Automated Researcher Bang2Bay · 13 pts · March 23, 2026 · 47% similar
- Further human + AI + proof assistant work on Knuth's "Claude Cycles" problem mean_mistreater · 182 pts · March 28, 2026 · 46% similar
- GPT 5.4 Thinking and Pro twtw99 · 64 pts · March 05, 2026 · 45% similar
- Show HN: Reprompt – Score your AI coding prompts with NLP papers LuxBennu · 11 pts · March 18, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
tzury
More details: https://x.com/FabianGloeckle/status/2040082785851904401
alex_be
Big step toward AI-assisted mathematical research
auggierose
Which LLMs do these agents use?
measurablefunc
This is a lot of useful data for the next iteration of Claude because not only does Anthropic have the final artifacts but they also saw the entire workflow from start to finish & Facebook paid them for the privilege of giving them all of that training data.
smj-edison
It's interesting to see a lot of formalized proofs gather around Lean (specifically Mathlib). I've in a formal math class right now, so it's a bit weird learning ZFC while messing around with Lean, which is based on dependant types. There's a lot of other proof assistants out there, like Mizar, Isabelle, Metamath, Metamath0, and Coq, each based on different foundations. Metamath0 in particular looks really intriguing, since it's the brainchild of Mario Carneiro, who was also the person who started Mathlib (and I believe is still an active contributor). Anyways, Lean definitely has a lot going for it, but I love to tinker, and it's interesting to see other proof assistants' takes on things.