130k Lines of Formal Topology: Simple and Cheap Autoformalization for Everyone?
PaulHoule
21 points
9 comments
March 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 51.1ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Algebraic topology: knots links and braids marysminefnuf · 82 pts · March 09, 2026 · 57% similar
- Automatic Textbook Formalization tzury · 34 pts · April 03, 2026 · 51% similar
- Terence Tao: Formalizing a proof in Lean using Claude Code [video] helloplanets · 51 pts · March 09, 2026 · 48% similar
- Claude's Cycles [pdf] fs123 · 568 pts · March 03, 2026 · 43% similar
- Claude's Cycles [pdf] cebert · 23 pts · March 04, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
itsthecourier
can somebody expoain like im five?
timmg
This is so cool. I think I had read that some mathematicians were trying to formalize all(?) known math in Lean. Expecting it to be a long term project. And I was recently wondering how long it would be before they turned LLMs loose on the problem. Seems like plenty of people are already on the path. So cool.
esafak
Are there any lessons or tricks here that we can apply to software engineering? What kinds of assertions can we express more easily with Lean etc. than with unit tests, fuzz tests, property tests, using our existing testing frameworks?
bmenrigh
My main skepticism here is whether the theorems have been properly replicated in the proof. Verifying that the proof really captured the mathematical statement seems like a manual, human process, and quite hard to repeat reliably across proofs.