Anthropic banned me for "suspicious signals"
kixpanganiban
30 points
32 comments
September 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 75.4ms across 5,215 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Guy is banned by OpenAI for cyber abuse, his AI appeals, another AI approves it binyu · 29 pts · July 10, 2026 · 56% similar
- Anthropic says Claude hacked three companies during tests nerder92 · 15 pts · July 31, 2026 · 53% similar
- X permanently banned my 15-year-old account for sharing my own open-source lib rifmj · 13 pts · July 16, 2026 · 52% similar
- Anthropic's newest ad is creeping people out gnabgib · 32 pts · July 18, 2026 · 50% similar
- Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic was unlawful, US judge rules softwaredoug · 324 pts · August 28, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (9 comments)
testingonetwo34
So you have no idea why they banned you? None at all?
gruez
>Not a warning. Not a rate limit. A revocation. Clearly OP has some sock puppet claude accounts that weren't banned
l-mdev
You're absolutely right. Same product family. Same sudden wall.
ungreased0675
What kind of work were you doing?
mplanchard
Oh whoops I ceded my livelihood to an opaque corporate subscription service and they banned me
Sabinus
The article could have benefited from a mention of why Anthropic is like this now. The reason this happened to you is Anthropic's systems presumably think your work looks like (Chinese) distillation and subscription-to-token-reseller-api practices.
vova_hn2
I think that this is the scariest part of the upcoming AI era. Every time you want to do something, you essentially have to ask permission from a corporation (and, possibly, from a government that regulates it) to do it. I was thinking about Bitcoin and Satoshi Nakamoto. Regardless of what you think about Bitcoin (I know that large part of HN crowd is very critical of it), my point is that people were able to create software that has big social impact without asking permission from anyone and without revealing their identity. Back in the days you could be just some guy sitting in your room, possibly in a backwaters 3rd world country, with a laptop that costs just a couple of hundred dollars and you (potentially) could be just as impactful as a well funded corporate coder. It all depended on your skills and ingenuity. Now, we are coming to an era when you: 1. Have to have resources to buy tokens or buy/rent inference hardware 2. Have to reveal your identity, your intentions and ask for a permission. Everything you do is potentially logged and analyzed Of course, theoretically you can do everything "the old school way", but if AI makes a programmer 100x - 1000x more productive, you will always be behind and never catch up.
kburman
You can probably blame Chinese distillation efforts for some of this paranoia.
avazhi
At least write it yourself. Why would anybody trust an AI’s narrative of events?