Anthropic bans users from being 'cruel' to its AI systems
pluc
33 points
29 comments
October 09, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 124.3ms across 8,999 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic bans 'abusive or cruel behavior' towards Claude mikelgan · 68 pts · October 08, 2026 · 74% similar
- Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools after blacklisting company, BBC told sbulaev · 11 pts · October 05, 2026 · 64% similar
- Anthropic admits AI 'not perfectly aligned' with human values fittingopposite · 11 pts · September 01, 2026 · 64% similar
- AI 'kill switch' may need to be mandatory, Anthropic co-founder tells BBC Betelbuddy · 55 pts · September 15, 2026 · 64% similar
- Anthropic says it blocked possible efforts to build biological weapons jbegley · 66 pts · September 10, 2026 · 63% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
Quarrelsome
I would suggest that a big part of avoiding abuse is that it leads to unexpected output. Given a model reflects its inputs, I imagine that abuse leads to unstable output as the model might then seek victim behaviours to better reflect the input. Often abuse comes from a bad place anyway. As the programming meme goes: > do what I want, not what I said which can create horrific alignment issues with conflicting demands.
chrisjj
> "This level of anthropomorphisation of AI is harmful. It leads people to believe that it's something it's not." It is easier to stomach when treated for what it is. Just more false advertising.
CoastalCoder
Bringing this up here for serious discussion: To repeat a point raised on Reddit: wouldn't this imply that Anthropic is involved in slavery?
perching_aix
Preciously discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50008565 My opinion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50012423
jocoda
Does this ban eventually extend to the support chat systems that we see everywhere now? And does that mean that soon we will not be able to insult companies for fear of hurting their feelings?
rolph
cruelty doesnt exist as a monopole,it also requires suffering, thus anthropic gives the appearance it is positing that its machines can suffer. this is preposterous. i think what is somewhat more plausible is swinging at low hanging fruit, by eliminating users that experience problematic operation, rather than, dealing with the deficiencies of thier machines. even vending operators understand the idea that a machine left in service while in deficient state, is a lose lose scenario. if you let it go empty of change, or product, or dispense substitutions whithout prior warnings, the user looses a buck or two, the operator loses substantially more, thus the service maintenance model of extract and replace, rather than continue to vend in a default, saves money and preserves chattels.
ChrisArchitect
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50008565
nikolay
It didn't ban me, but it did warn me and quote their acceptable use policy or something.