Your phone is about to stop being yours
doener
1183 points
548 comments
April 28, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 77.1ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Keep Android Open bjornroberg · 193 pts · April 15, 2026 · 60% similar
- Your Computer Isn't Yours orionblastar · 11 pts · April 17, 2026 · 51% similar
- Your Computer Doesn't Belong to You Anymore ethanplant · 14 pts · May 09, 2026 · 50% similar
- Your phone is an entire computer medhir · 288 pts · March 13, 2026 · 50% similar
- Android now stops you sharing your location in photos edent · 335 pts · April 13, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
smalltorch
The opt out is graphene os yeah?
bitpush
Isnt the title a bit dramatic? I remember reading you can still install apps but you just need to click a few buttons.
zb3
Yes, but not because of those changes in the GMS stock OS, but because the ability to unlock the bootloader (and install the OS you can actually control) is being increasingly limited. Stock GMS Android was never yours, you only had access to basic permissions, privileged/signature permissions were only accessible to Google/vendors anyway.
drnick1
I don't care, I run Graphene, and my phone is definitely mine. Most Android apps just work, and the ones that don't are the kind of malware I am happy to do without.
Xunjin
Let me play out a scenario, imagine to use a Desktop Hardware like a complete built rig, you would need a specific OS like Windows 11 and you could not run Linux on it, just because it's a vendor lock-in. Why is this acceptable for phones but would not for the case above? I know a lot of people don't care, and that's ok, but we should root for an open choice for the users.
devinprater
Ugh such overreaction. ADB is still a thing. Apple doesn't even have an official command like tool where you can just push an IPA to your phone. Goodness.
NDlurker
>Android's openness was never just a feature. It was the promise that distinguished it from iPhone. Millions chose Android for exactly that reason. Google is now revoking that promise unilaterally, on devices already in people's pockets, because they've decided they have enough market dominance and regulatory capture to get away with it. This is why I've stuck with Android for the past 15 years.
ChrisArchitect
Some more discussions: 2 weeks ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778274 February https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47139765 October https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45742488
xnx
Better to share how to install apps and alternative app stores instead of fearmongering around very reasonable security measures.
vrganj
This feels like something where the EU Commission should step in. This is directly counter to the Digital Markets Act, it's Google abusing its gatekeeper position.
mmooss
There is a negative network effect: The opt-out is so complex and time-consuming that it will deter almost all users (even if some on HN say they will do it). With so few users, many fewer developers will release apps that don't comply with Google's requirements. Then the value of opting out will decline significantly, which will reduce the number of people doing it, which will reduce the number of apps released ... How do corporate users distribute custom apps on iPhones? Must they distribute them via Apple's store or is there some corporate mode, maybe involving X.509 certs and device management, that enables large-scale professional users to sideload?
TGower
This is a wild misrepresentation of the situation. Saying there is no opt-out is just false, they even provide the information on how users can opt-out. The "mandatory 24 hour cooling-off period" is also misleading, it's easy to bypass the cooling-off period with ADB.
buzzwords
I imagine most of us here will look elsewhere when we next upgrade. But are those numbers large enough to form a viable alternative?
add-sub-mul-div
Algorithmically removing words from a headline with confidence that what comes out will be better is the precise intersection of stupid and arrogant that defines the modern tech industry.
pngwen
This change has served me well! I have been a Mac OS X users for years who used an android phone. As soon as google announced their impending walled garden status, I went out and bought into the ios eco system. I have really been enjoying my iphone, ipad, and apple watch. You see, the only value that Android really offered me was the ability to run my own code on my own device. Since they are taking that away that just makes it a crappier shadow of the vastly superior apple experience. And, as it turns out, ios is less restrictive than it was 18 years ago when I left them for Android!
dethos
To be sincere, they were never truly ours. A proof of that is they were able to come up with this, and you don't have a way to reject it. What we actually need are (open) alternatives, not to double down on Google's ecosystem and Google-controlled OS. We need to control the device we bought and be able to run whatever we wish on it. Just like we do on PCs.
WesolyKubeczek
On one hand, having a free for all is very good, especially for developers, and for programmability of our devices as such. Screw iPads. On the other hand, malware which coaxes normies into installing unverified apks, is an undeniable fact of life. It's nice to be pontificating as a power user who has never been phished or whose devices never became botnet zombies in their life. On yet another hand, higher-end malware (made by those who can afford the store fees) is there on the freaking play store and app store, so, I guess, shrug
larodi
Phone is yours. Software it runs not.
Jackevansevo
I don't understand, there was all this regulation for force apple to allow alternative app stores, and now google are pulling this move? How is this not the same walled garden approach apple was forced to change?
josefritzishere
So what you're saying is that I have about 3 months to switch to Graphene? Really though, is this not the very definition of monopolistic behavior? Did they not just lose a lawsuit over this?