You Don't Need a Vector Database
kencho
20 points
24 comments
March 08, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 78.9ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Do you even need a database? upmostly · 231 pts · April 15, 2026 · 63% similar
- OpenData Vector: MIT-Licensed Vector Search on Object Storage apurvamehta · 35 pts · May 14, 2026 · 61% similar
- People Do Not Yearn for Automation icco · 83 pts · April 23, 2026 · 45% similar
- Show HN: XTrace – Encrypted vector DB (search embeddings without exposing them) TristanX · 13 pts · April 22, 2026 · 45% similar
- It Was Never About the Database goloroden · 15 pts · March 08, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
noemit
The Vector Database obsession came from RAG, which came from a marketing idea to calm down enterprise fears about hallucination with RAG. Will save this article because I feel like I have this conversation weekly when people think they need a vector database for something they definitely do not.
sirfz
You don't need a vector db, you just need np.dot
kenforthewin
If I understand correctly, the vecstore product is an api that wraps a vector database (among other features). So the pitch here is something like “you don’t need a vector database, you need an api wrapper to a vector database that we manage for you”.
exhost
> Please don't use HN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity.
cpursley
Or you could just use the new BM25 extension and if thats not enough, bring in the vector extension, which you can run as hybrid and not have to bolt yet another paid 3rd party thing: https://postgresisenough.dev/tools?category=search
stephantul
This is a thinly veiled commercial, not really useful.