Yann LeCun says Dario Amodei "knows nothing about AI effects on jobs"
kordlessagain
25 points
19 comments
April 20, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 69.6ms across 5,126 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- CEOs admit AI had no impact on employment or productivity tcp_handshaker · 78 pts · April 19, 2026 · 62% similar
- Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military deal ‘straight up lies’ SilverElfin · 435 pts · March 04, 2026 · 60% similar
- Marc Andreessen Is Right That AI Isn't Killing Jobs. Interest Rate Hikes Are bigbobbeeper · 29 pts · April 02, 2026 · 58% similar
- Tech CEOs suddenly love blaming AI for mass job cuts. Why? tartoran · 14 pts · March 30, 2026 · 55% similar
- Economists Once Dismissed the A.I. Job Threat, but Not Anymore chrisaycock · 19 pts · April 03, 2026 · 55% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
ekjhgkejhgk
LeCun is playing the game, Amodei is playing the meta game. Amodei's intention is to signal to the corporate world that his product is extremely valuable because they might be able to fire half of their entry level people. Amodei doesn't care whether that's actually true, it's just a sales pitch. Amodei is advertising his product, but LeCun thinks he's making predictions.
Glemllksdf
Doesn't matter anyway what exactly they are saying. On one side you can interpolate in what direction it can go, than you can also add the general speed we are currently seeying and then you can try it out yourself. The conclusion? 1. its clear that currently its critical to be aware of whats going on. With this you can act sooner or be part of this 2. if it hits hard but not too hard, you might have an advantage because you know how to use it 3. if its stalls you can reduce your effort in this area
jqpabc123
He argued that AI systems are already capable of tackling genuinely complex challenges. And they are already capable of making a genuine mess of things --- particularly over the long term. Some AI models are sorta OK at writing code. None of them are very good at maintaining it. Straightening out the mess that AI makes is going to be even harder and more costly after the labor market for developers retracts.
therobots927
Yann is a serious person in a very unserious field. He will be vindicated sooner than you think.
slava_
I don't understand why debates on "AI effect on economy" are switching to "how good AI will be". It's not about "is technology capable" but about market response. and it's so random and unpredictable, so heavily depends on the sentiment, economic conditions, regulations.
pixel_popping
I disagree, Anthropic has data to deduct and predict probably more accurately than experts, maybe not the best experts, but at least average ones.
ChrisArchitect
Source: https://x.com/ylecun/status/2045610129119117574 ( https://xcancel.com/ylecun/status/2045610129119117574 )
blargey
“Listen to the economists about the economy, not us” sounds reasonable on its own, but the names LeCun lists are all in the lower/modest AI capabilities camp (and there are economists modeling under the assumption of higher capabilities), so it looks like a thinly veiled proxy for more unresolvable bickering over future AI capabilities predictions.