WTF Ubuntu?
chalmovsky
1412 points
601 comments
November 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 118.6ms across 11,391 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- A third way of using Linux speckx · 29 pts · October 05, 2026 · 51% similar
- Being Linux Torvalds surprisetalk · 24 pts · July 25, 2026 · 50% similar
- Unix Was Right. We Made Linux Too Complicated [video] jamesgill · 11 pts · September 18, 2026 · 47% similar
- What even is an OS now? fratellobigio · 143 pts · September 25, 2026 · 46% similar
- Leaving Linux speckx · 22 pts · September 15, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
ForHackernews
This turnaround time is appalling, especially given that Debian shipped a fix weeks ago. Poor show, Canonical.
arjie
It is strange, agreed. I just manually mitigated it using Claude and also blocked ipoptions at the router and in every node iptables.
bortimus
When AWS is shipping patches for Amazon Linux 2 and Ubuntu is still waiting.. yeah.
origini
Its not just Canonical but yes when a few month ago the local root exploit appeared, it wasn't fixed for a few days either.
Gabriel54
What is keeping people on Ubuntu instead of just using Debian? I'm genuinely curious. What is Ubuntu offering that Debian doesn't provide?
mag7269
Where is he moving his shit to, then?
gonzalohm
"The free operating system that I use is not giving me enterprise level security updates" I believe you can contribute to Ubuntu's source code right? Why don't you fix the issue then?
curt15
Did Ubuntu Pro customers get the fix?
512bitCrypto
Should we also talk about the snaps when trying to install package in Docker image (such as chromium-browser)?
worthless-trash
Its only the media / publicity that drives this one, there were worse within the last year that nobody seems to care about.
stroebs
I've switched my default to AlmaLinux. Was a fan of Ubuntu since 8.04 (Hardy Heron) but stopped since Canonical pushed hard on Ubuntu Pro.
linuxftw
Everyone is just using Ubuntu for free of charge for the most part. You get what you pay for. On another note, you can probably easily install the Debian kernel onto your machine. "But we need signed kernels!" Well, that's a big "I told you so" from the people that were against only a handful of distros being able to create signed kernels with MS derived keys like 15 years ago.
pizzafeelsright
In the current age of AI, open source means exploits can discovered directly through the code. The flip side is the patches can also be managed. We are in that period between when software was good enough and when software is certified as secure by the writers. The days of importing frameworks and libraries written by strangers is over. I would say the entire industry is not prepared at this moment for the unpatchable event where the only solution is to power off or disconnect.
_joel
Switch to vanilla Debian. What I did, no real issues that weren't easy to fix. Rock solid still.
StrLght
Have companies been compromised because of this vulnerability? Ubuntu has an absolutely massive install base. The lack of notable incidents suggests that 9.8 might not reflect real-world well. Maybe it's time for StealMyBitcoinV2…
jmclnx
>Oh and btw, distros run by volunteers (Debian, Arch, Alpine...) And Slackware too: Thu Oct 22 23:04:17 UTC 2026 patches/packages/linux-5.15.223/kernel-generic-5.15.223-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded. patches/packages/linux-5.15.223/kernel-headers-5.15.223-x86-1.txz: Upgraded. patches/packages/linux-5.15.223/kernel-huge-5.15.223-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded. patches/packages/linux-5.15.223/kernel-modules-5.15.223-x86_64-1.txz: Upgraded. patches/packages/linux-5.15.223/kernel-source-5.15.223-noarch-1.txz: Upgraded. This update fixes bugs and security issues, including the PwnEscape flaw. For more information, see: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-99999 (* Security fix *) From: https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware64-15.0/Change...
vanschelven
I knew what this is about before clicking the link. While trying to find remediations for vulnerable systems I was also looking for any kind of "official" statement on literally WTF is going on here from the Ubuntu side, but I haven't been able to find one yet. I guess it has to go through the "hacker news puts enough attention on it for someone to care" phase which we all know so well...
stackghost
I suspect at this point that it’s a bunch of techno-bureaucrats at Canonical who are dogmatically sticking with their release cadence because artificial justifications. I have worked in big organizations where The Process, or The $place Way of Doing Things, has become so big that the bureaucracy takes on a life of its own and you end up having a whole team of people who just manage the process so that the people actually doing the work can maybe get something done. I haven’t used Ubuntu for a few years now but I’m glad they’re getting this trial by fire now. This new era of software vulnerabilities is going to reduce the viability of a lot of smaller distros who more or less are entirely dependent on upstream for security and reliability. I sincerely wish the Ubuntu folks well but this is a sink or swim moment, and even if they sink it will be a net positive for Linux as a whole as weaker projects get picked off like the slowest antelope in the herd.
pixelesque
It's not *just* Ubuntu is it? I think Redhat still hasn't released any patches? (their status still says 'ongoing')
strenholme
Here is Ubuntu’s webpage on this vulnerability: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-98432 It’s still, over a week after disclosure and patches, unpatched in Ubuntu. As for me, a part of me wants to move over to Rocky Linux 10.