Working from home? That will be extra. Renters rage over new fee
healsdata
12 points
6 comments
July 30, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 206.6ms across 15,510 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- New rental trend? A $200 'work-from-home fee' tacked on to Bay Area lease randycupertino · 20 pts · July 23, 2026 · 74% similar
- Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore littlexsparkee · 167 pts · June 18, 2026 · 48% similar
- Salary isn't everything: Why flexibility to work remotely is the future of work robtherobber · 15 pts · May 08, 2026 · 46% similar
- Fixed-Rate Mortgages Are Rent Control for Homeoweners NomNew · 14 pts · June 28, 2026 · 45% similar
- Home alone: Remote work, isolation, and mental health speckx · 157 pts · June 06, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
chiph
This is because of additional power & water costs? The landlord should install individual meters on the units. Or at least sub-meter, so they can be paid accurately by the residents. Offering unlimited utilities is a stupid mistake by a landlord.
jerlam
Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027039 (34 comments)
digitalsushi
Makes sense. Retired people already pay a surcharge because they're home all day so why not work from home people too?
jnyst1985
I don’t understand. If you’re home more, you’re already likely to pay more in utilities. But now landlords want to charge more for “wear”? Sounds like greed to me.