Why copyright makes no sense
mnaimd
11 points
11 comments
September 30, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 91.7ms across 8,145 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- YouTuber Davie504 slapped with ridiculous copyright claim [video] Panoramix · 45 pts · August 14, 2026 · 48% similar
- Copyright does more harm than good and should be abolished Cider9986 · 302 pts · September 09, 2026 · 48% similar
- Victory Appeals Court Rejects Expansive New Copyright Claim hn_acker · 15 pts · September 17, 2026 · 47% similar
- EFF to Courts: Don't Rewrite Copyright over AI Hype DeepLogin · 161 pts · September 01, 2026 · 46% similar
- AI and the Destruction of the Creative Commons rakel_rakel · 228 pts · September 20, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
1223aZ
Children, please remember: - RIAA bad, Musk good. - Artists bad, Altman good. - Authors bad, Amodei good.
beardyw
You should add [video] to the title.
oldgregg
It’s been about control of culture and rent seeking for a long time
wahern
A scholarly and far more rigorous argument against copyright and patents can be found in Against Intellectual Monopoly by economists Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine. "We show through theory and example that intellectual monopoly is not necessary for innovation and as a practical matter is damaging to growth, prosperity and liberty." It's a published book you can buy in hard copy (I bought the ebook on Kindle) but practicing what they preach it's freely available online, http://dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm
fmajid
Copyright makes perfect sense for the purpose it was originally invented for: censorship. The British monarchy created copyright, literally to control what printers were allowed to copy. To enforce this, printing presses were tightly regulated, with severe criminal penalties for operating an unlicensed press. Basically what Big Copyright wants for their own purposes.