What's the most popular number in Hacker News titles?

omgmog 46 points 23 comments July 15, 2026
blog.omgmog.net · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (11 comments)

pm2222

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law

fghorow

Probably 42, but I could be mistaken...

mwigdahl

You missed a great opportunity to title this "The 10 most popular numbers in Hacker News titles"!

laurentlb

Thanks for providing the query and a link to execute it (I didn't know about that one). Now I can play with it and find the most popular words... "to", "the", "of". I don't know what I expected.

calvinmorrison

We're number 1! benfords law strikes again. useful for fraud analysis too

Xirdus

I really wish the analysis didn't cut off at exactly 10 numbers. Rerunning the query with higher LIMIT, I noticed the following: - The very next two numbers are 100 and 0. While 100 is consistent with the article's explanations, 0 still placing high despite fixing the query warrants further investigation. A quick glance at returned headlines shows the problem of phantom zeroes is not, in fact, fixed. - The query doesn't group decimals and integers together. 2.0 is at #17 with 10k hits, while 1.0 is at #26 with 5k hits. So not only is the "version number" explanation for top numbers wrong - the claim that earlier version numbers are more common than later version numbers is wrong too.

jdw64

I once did some small work with a mathematician who was an online friend of mine. He was really into Benford's Law. A lot of mathematicians seem to love Benford's Law, and I wonder why that is. I'm not sure if I was rude to him, but we lost touch, and I miss him. I learned so much from his code.

benj111

My guess is 1 (or 1.0) declaring something has reached 'stable' Edit. Perhaps the title should be 'parsing numbers is hard'.

gweinberg

I imagine "one" is usually spelled out in titles.

JadeNB

The article mentions one reason for small numbers predominating: > The first is listicles. “3 ways to do X”, “5 things I wish I’d known”, “10 tools I actually use”. The listicle is practically the native unit of the link post, and its count is almost always small and round. Nobody writes “17 things I wish I’d known” unless they genuinely have 17 things, which is rare, whereas “5 things” is a decision made in a title editor. But doesn't the title mangler specifically try to strip out numbers that look like they're part of listicle titles?

wartywhoa23

Disappointed at the lack of 23.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
14,015 stories · 131,331 chunks indexed