What's the deal with all the random weekly quota resets for agents lately?

YeahThisIsMe

I like money.

clickety_clack

If I had to guess uncharitably, I’d say they want you to feel like you keep getting something extra for “free” while you’re getting the same service you should have expected as normal 3 months ago.

adamsmark

My guess is they are getting folks used to the idea of: 1. The end of unlimited token subsidization and a new status quo of metered usage limits. 2. Adding to the above, self-initiated usage limit resets give you some control and again help lessen the sting of the end of subsidization. Right now though, I think Anthropic and OpenAI are in open MAU war ahead of their respective IPOs and that might be a bigger factor.

jdthedisciple

That explains it! I was wondering about this just today as I saw it hd reset. Alas I don't need to wait another 7 days..

dlenski

This article reads like a description of gambling-addiction behavior; the author appears to be addicted to using LLMs. He's eagerly awaiting his next hit of dopamine from his favorite model. He's setting timers to be ready for when his next hit comes available. He's spinning up unnecessary queries just to start the timer ticking on new models. You could basically write the same article about some guy who sits in a casino all day eagerly awaiting double-your-winnings bonuses or similar.

CamperBob2

Competition. If Anthropic had followed through on their plan to put Fable under API pricing, users would have jumped ship en masse to GPT 5.6 (or perhaps to K3 if it turns out to be good enough.)

Jcampuzano2

They're giving everyone their next hit. What I read on social media about people and these resets gives off literal worst kind of addiction vibes. I've literally seen people talking about "Oh I had an existential crisis without Fable/GPT-5.6" These people legitimately need help, or alternatively a social life. Maybe its different on my end because I just use a sub outside of work for fun stuff. At work its not my money so I don't really care. I go to work, maybe use these subs at home every once in a while for a fun personal project and if I hit the limits (I rarely even do) I play video games or hang out with my wife/family. People are borderline tying their identities to these models it seems, and yet most people aren't even building anything interesting.

j45

It feels like Anthropic was affected by resource limitations upon launch or big adoption curves in the past, and now they're tyring to be mindful of having less of those, in several ways, one of which is trying to keep capacity to keep core services running and let the high demand not impact the rest of the system. WHen it doesn't turn out that way, it opens up options. At the same time if other model providers were anticipating Anthropic or someone else to have problems at launch, and were waiting in the wings with their own models to launch competitively, it sets off a capacity release competition. One might lower prices, one might give it away, or just make it available, and then there are users on other platforms with limits, or free until a certain day, etc.

skeledrew

Yeah I've been noticing for a while. Definitely didn't want to be one of the first to bring it up! Few weeks ago it was really unexpected resets the day before the actually reset. Now I'm noticing Claude keeps going for a while after the 7 day quota hits 100% (I setup my statusline to include quota as I got tired of checking the app), but also it could just be bad calibration and even at 100% I still actually have quota left.

skybrian

I think this is because they're having trouble with capacity planning. They plan conservatively, and they have extra capacity that's going unused. But they don't want to commit to anything, in case usage spikes.

h4kunamata

Read: AI companies found a way to make AI chatbot to look less expensive driving people to become more addicted to it.

Havoc

Push down official on paper limits while limiting real world backlash by artificially inflating real world usage above paper limits with resets.

acedTrex

Ive typed out several things, none of them really capture succinctly the level of disdain I have for people that this article is describing. I cannot fathom the idea that one is warping their work on a given engineering problem around the availability of a magic next token predictor box.

tough

Operant conditioning random reinforcement is a pretty well researched science

cadamsdotcom

This is the result of a forgotten phenomenon called "competition".