We have LLMs now. Why are the docs still wrong?
higeorge13
12 points
9 comments
October 08, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 92.5ms across 8,906 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- The LLM Critics Are Right. I Use LLMs Anyway JeremyTheo · 209 pts · July 16, 2026 · 57% similar
- LLMs Are Still Toxic, Stuck in the Past, and Bad at Math Eyosias_x5 · 15 pts · July 24, 2026 · 55% similar
- Extensible Software in the age of LLMs coloneltcb · 137 pts · August 19, 2026 · 54% similar
- Humanising LLM Outputs Is Dumb kuberwastaken · 18 pts · August 10, 2026 · 53% similar
- I Don't Like LLMs TangerineDream · 210 pts · September 17, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
giancarlostoro
“WTFM!” “Write The Freaking Manual!”
arm32
I block domains on my home network younger than 30 days old. This one's blocked. Slop probable.
efilife
this is an ad
readme
Instead of reading the article I will tell you why the docs are wrong. It's because most teams don't incentivize writing documentation and a lot of them just don't care. The team guru's job security is predicated on knowing the answer to everything so it's a losing proposition for them. If you write good docs about one of these topics, don't be surprised if they try to find a way to punish you for it. If you're in an SWE job, only write documentation if someone tells you to. Otherwise, just give up.
euroderf
It might be slop, and it might be an ad, but the question it poses is entirely valid. But it does make me wonder if it undercuts the value prop for component-based content mgmt systems, because an LLM can cover an entire diverse documentation base effortlessly, without using components as a crutch for managing complexity.