USB Cheat Sheet (2022)
gwerbret
237 points
50 comments
April 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 82.8ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Claude Code Cheat Sheet phasE89 · 284 pts · March 23, 2026 · 53% similar
- USB for Software Developers: An introduction to writing userspace USB drivers WerWolv · 252 pts · April 08, 2026 · 48% similar
- Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables sleepingNomad · 471 pts · May 01, 2026 · 46% similar
- WebUSB Extension for Firefox tuananh · 225 pts · April 20, 2026 · 44% similar
- Using a USB switch as a full KVM lwhsiao · 29 pts · April 17, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (17 comments)
brcmthrowaway
Where does TB5 come into all of this?
15155
Good sheet. Worth adding: - Female vs male crossover naming and pinouts for Type-C connectors - Actual voltage, modulation and signaling schemes (USB4v2 uses PAM3 11b/7t encoding) - PD generations and profiles
Neywiny
I actually like the 3.2 naming. Gen is speed, "by" is width. It puts it very roughly on par with PCIe's naming which nobody complains about. I just don't like that USB 3, USB 3.1, and USB 3.2 are the same things. And that sales people don't seem to understand that saying a chip supports 3.1 or 3.2 tells me it's anywhere from 5-20gbps which isn't ideal.
DHowett
Excellent article. If I could offer one correction, it would be that SBU (as specified by the USB 3.0 Promoter Group[1]) means "Sideband Use" rather than "Secondary Bus". On some devices, it is used to carry UART; on others, audio. [1]: https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/USB%20Type-C%20Spec%... (pdf)
maxloh
I once heard that the USB naming is misleading by design so that vendors could still sell older generations accessories they had in stock. The USB-IF just rebrands the old ones to make them sound current. Imagine the following naming: USB 3.0 / USB 3.1 Gen 1 / USB 3.2 Gen 1 -> USB 3 5Gbps USB 3.1 / USB 3.1 Gen 2 / USB 3.2 Gen 2 -> USB 3 10Gbps USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 -> USB 3 20Gbps Isn't that much clearer? I think USB 4 is finally going to the right direction.
naveed125
nice work, thanks
1a527dd5
Tangent: Author has this fabulous post I'd highly recommend: https://fabiensanglard.net/mjolnir/index.html I read it once years ago and I come back to it every now and then wishing my current PC (10+ years and going) would gently die so I could finally build something small and tiny.
retired
The simplicity of Thunderbolt. Versions 1 and 2 used mini DisplayPort, 3 and upwards USB-C. Version 1 was 10Gbps, 2 was 20Gbps, 3 was 40Gbps, 4 was 40Gbps, 5 is 80 or 120Gbps with boosting. A Thunderbolt 5 cable will always support 80Gbps, DisplayPort 2.1, PCIe, USB4 and power of up to 240 watt.
conception
This article is why I replaced all the usb dock cables in the office to make sure the usb cable connected to the laptops was transferring enough power so the laptop wouldn't silently lower its frequency for the lower power draw. 10-30% speed bump just because.
drob518
I’ve been a tech guy for 45 years and I still can’t figure out USB and Thunderbolt and what goes with what and how fast it’s supposed to run.
pxeboot
I still don't understand why MacBooks support USB4/Thunderbolt 4/5, but NOT USB 3.2 Gen 2x2. So you can get 20-40Gb/s speeds with more expensive external disks, but only 10Gb/s with the cheaper, more commonly available ones that advertise 20Gb/s.
userbinator
IMHO USB 3.0 was the last sanely-named version. Then again, if you're familiar with Ethernet, the proliferation of variants isn't unexpected.
offbyone42
I just wish product listings were clear and actually followed the specs.
dang
Related. Others? USB Cheat Sheet - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31271038 - May 2022 (168 comments)
floxy
I don't know what short-distance data communications will be like in 2050, but we know it will be called USB.
AdamH12113
This is generally good but it’s missing low speed (1.5 megabits/second), which is also under USB 1.1.
mahirsaid
Great way of identifying the difference in types of USB