US House rejects FISA Section 702 extension, warrantless surveillance expires

ck2 84 points 22 comments June 11, 2026
www.axios.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (8 comments)

ck2

I'm sure this administration will totally obey that without any enforcement or penalties and pardons awaiting oh wait, it could still be renewed/recreated > Democrats have refused to back an extension of Section 702 unless Trump reverses his decision to name Pulte as acting DNI I guess it's their only card to play but still, how about no warrantless anything considering there's a Constitution and all that

sitkack

Surveillance won't stop and the warrants won't start. Now what?

rdudek

I have to admire the double-dipping business model of private companies getting paid by local governments to setup surveillance cameras and harvest data. Then the same goverment will pay to get warrantless access to that same data.

0xbadcafebee

https://archive.is/p0sBN

inigyou

My chosen interpretation is that they've let it expire because they've found enough ways to spy on us that they don't need it. Ranging from getting everything they need from advertising companies and Flock, to just ignoring the law and doing it anyway because they know it won't be enforced.

hmm37

Now they just need to get rid of stuff like Sec. 622 of this bill proposal ( https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/s4615/BILLS-119s4615pcs.p... ) which would give all US intelligence to Israel.

iamnothere

Rare good news. I hate to see so much knee-jerk doomerism. Don’t forget to celebrate small wins even if the battle isn’t over.

k310

Government doesn't need warrants. They spy the old-fashioned way. They BUY it from our surveillance capitalist overlords. They are interchangeable pieces these days.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
10,324 stories · 97,050 chunks indexed