Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI
papergirl
610 points
599 comments
September 27, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 93.9ms across 7,833 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Apple Sues OpenAI allending · 17 pts · July 10, 2026 · 61% similar
- Microsoft, OpenAI lose fight to hide internal docs admitting scraping is theft pseudolus · 41 pts · September 17, 2026 · 60% similar
- New York Times says OpenAI hid evidence in ChatGPT copyright trial sbulaev · 23 pts · July 09, 2026 · 60% similar
- Apple files lawsuit accusing OpenAI of stealing trade secrets root-parent · 21 pts · July 10, 2026 · 60% similar
- Apple sues OpenAI, accusing it of stealing company secrets jbegley · 110 pts · July 10, 2026 · 59% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
papergirl
Newly released court filings quote an OpenAI researcher saying: “I was just worried about optics - i.e. 'openai uses copyrighted data from sketchy russian website’ showing up on HN would be unfortunate." That's just one of several interesting quotes that have surfaced in documents from the Authors Guild's lawsuit against OpenAI.
Skyy93
This is a lobby organisation using only the pieces and bits they like to push their own agenda. "sketchy russian website", how about using some more clear description like: A library for sharing books and articles that should be partly public domain because they were paid for by the public. Only some of the material is copyrighted by authors. However, some of their work is so old that it is not reprinted anyway. But of course such an explanation would not click. I also don't see a problem with statements about making people jobless. Imagine if every robotic or automation company advertised like this: Yeah, you'll buy tons of expensive robots and still rely on expensive labor from real people without any efficiency gains.
shaunpud
https://web.archive.org/web/20260927062011/https://authorsgu...
alansaber
Not even openai want to get flamed on show hn
monster_truck
I could not care less
hnfong
Can we fix the title? This is clickbait for HN, the actual article's title is "Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Top Execs Knew Their Mass Book Piracy Was Illegal And Would Put Authors Out of Work"
hn1rig3rak
Pulled datasets off libgen for a corpus once and it's overwhelmingly in-copyright textbooks, the public domain framing doesn't really hold up.
whatever1
Is our opinion that important ? Nice !
handoflixue
It's wild how much weight "they're destroying jobs" has. I dare say that car manufacturers are aware of their impact on the horse and buggy industry. Calculator manufacturers wrecked the livelihood of mathematicians and accountants. Technology is in the business of putting people out of work, by inventing better ways of doing things. Or rather, any time you invent a better way of doing things, that's fundamentally going to disrupt all the businesses built around older technologies.
AraneaDev
Lol, the fear mongering is just part of the hype train at this point.
usernametaken29
If this doesn’t put anyone in prison then we might as well declare copyright dead. They knew they broke the law and then they deliberately covered it up. How much more evidence is required here?
vilius
It’s 2030, I open HN and top result is from 7 hours ago, 2100 points, 700 comments: > AI agent accidentally publishes OpenAI’s unreleased model weights The optics are bad. The submission marks a turning page in human history.
pera
Can some explain why would a billionaire like Altman care about the opinions expressed on HN? Given the political power they have, particularly now with the Trump administration, whatever "optics" exist on this forum seems completely insignificant
senectus1
the AI isnt going to destroy jobs in numbers large enough to blip the unemployment stats more thna a qtr a percent. the economics of those companies will cause a catastrophic wipe out of jobs across the board.
sidcool
HN is their AB testing playground.
Betelbuddy
The Title should be: "Top Execs Knew Their Mass Book Piracy Was Illegal And Would Put Authors Out of Work"
fragmede
Posted by an account created to post this.
fwlr
Cute that they were concerned, but they need not have worried - as you can clearly see from any HN comments section on these kinds of articles, everyone long ago wrote down their conclusion (“OpenAI/Anthropic/LLMs are good/bad”) at the bottom of the page, and now all we are doing is shuffling facts, quotes, and arguments around the page above it. We are very clever to make it look like the conclusion below follows from the arguments above; but we are also careful to never smudge our bottom line, so it will never change.
spacecadet
To all the top comments making analogies about destroying jobs; horses, buggies, calculators... what?! You are awful people. We're not talking about shit jobs, these are peoples creative passions, livelihoods, and life long careers. It looks like OpenAI had nothing to fear. Fuck you.
shevy-java
Doesn't this fulfil the criterium of an illegal organisation, aka a mafia? They knew the damage they would cause - and went on regardless. The USA need to fix their court system. Right now it is just OligarchBros running the show. The small thief stealing a wallet gets put in jail for years. If you are rich enough, you pay some peanuts and that's the end of it.