UK's Online Safety Act has made 'absolutely no difference,' kids say
Bender
29 points
6 comments
September 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 61.4ms across 5,468 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- UK internet age checks have boosted rogue adult sites, says Pornhub thm · 56 pts · August 20, 2026 · 50% similar
- Digital sovereignty is real in Europe. The UK? Not so much beardyw · 17 pts · July 30, 2026 · 49% similar
- EU will seek to limit children's access to social media austinallegro · 14 pts · July 13, 2026 · 46% similar
- Stop Killing the Internet: No Digital ID and No Age Verification doener · 556 pts · July 28, 2026 · 44% similar
- The House Passed the KIDS Act–The Senate Should Reject It hn_acker · 19 pts · July 09, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
fyredge
> UK politicians had pushed for controls covering such features, either through the OSA or separate legislation, but none has materialized. So it's not that online safety act didn't work, but rather that it was not enforced? I'm not familiar with the legislation, but I do hope that they implemented penalties for companies who do not follow the law, bit meaningless if they didn't.
ktallett
It was never going to work. Unsurprisingly tech illiterate people are not really going to understand that you can't shove the porn genie back in the bottle. It's available on so many sites that you won't be able to force them all to collaborate. The government also won't be able to find the owners to fine them (that's without debating are you really operating in a country just because you don't block content). This was clearly a hope on restricting freedoms more, just like the goal of banning Vpns and e2e messaging.
spacedcowboy
It's bloody well made a difference to those trying to provide a web-service, especially a user-to-user one. The main difference is now that it's pretty stupid to go online with a new service without running everything through a lawyer, given the OSA has teeth - criminal penalties to people with say in the company. If I were to print out my OSA docs, they'd come to 168 pages. That's just my take on the regs, my remedies, my policies, and a study of any weaknesses in the coverage of the harms defined by the OSA. Then, because kids under 18 can access the site, there's the children-specific definitions of the same - except these cover more child-focussed areas like harassment, brigading, encitement to suicide etc. That's another 123 pages. For a single-operator site like I intend to be, that's a damn lot of paperwork, before I've ever even launched the site. Understandably so, the solicitor is keen to charge quite a bit of money to make sure that volume of content is above-board and legal. So things got expensive before they ever even get going. And it's kind of annoying to see the kids say it doesn't matter anyway [sigh] - as if I thought it ever would.