Toronto-Based VPN Provider Plans to Quit Canada over Lawful-Access Bill
speckx
134 points
51 comments
October 06, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 275.5ms across 8,687 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- U.S. Site Blocking Bill Adds VPNs to the List of Blocking Intermediaries iamnothere · 16 pts · September 21, 2026 · 57% similar
- Shutting down our public encrypted DNS mywacaday · 306 pts · September 04, 2026 · 53% similar
- 'VPNs are lawful technical tools,' says EU Court in landmark copyright ruling speckx · 426 pts · July 30, 2026 · 52% similar
- 'VPNs are lawful technical tools,' says EU Court in landmark copyright ruling healsdata · 469 pts · July 21, 2026 · 52% similar
- Canada Is Building a Surveillance State via 5 Bills vancouvermatt · 23 pts · August 11, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
LorenDB
Problem is, where do you take a company like this if you want peace of mind that the new host country won't immediately try to pass a similar law?
elmer2
Why don't people ever realize that the more Liberal a government is, the more control they will demand from our lives.
iamnothere
I’m more concerned about OpenBSD. Given how centralized the project governance is, and its base in Canada, I can imagine the government attempting to (for example) force the project to serve backdoored images or updates to targeted people. A backdoor or bugdoor in the source would probably be spotted by someone, and I’m not even sure the bill allows a broad tool like that, but that’s not the only way to compromise software users. Fortunately the mirrors are distributed, so maybe that reduces the risk.
singpolyma3
Didn't this bill get amended to clarify that no encryption back doors are required?
teamspirit
I’m more curious about Tailscale. How would this law, or these types of laws, affect them?