'There Is No Going Back': The Inside Story of Europe's Rupture with America
Alien1Being
63 points
58 comments
July 06, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 823.9ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Challenging the Narrative of European Decline vrganj · 65 pts · June 18, 2026 · 56% similar
- European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low marcyb5st · 107 pts · June 10, 2026 · 56% similar
- All the Ways Europe Is Ditching American Technology rawgabbit · 24 pts · June 08, 2026 · 54% similar
- The End of North America rbanffy · 33 pts · July 04, 2026 · 53% similar
- Operation "Epic Fury" Deepens Transatlantic Rift: U.S., EU at Odds over Security vrganj · 19 pts · April 08, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (16 comments)
shmeeed
http://archive.today/Ujf4C
lateralux
Europe is finally breaking with America ? At least this time, nobody has to try invading France first ^^
HarHarVeryFunny
Trust is slow to build, quick to destroy. It wouldn't make any strategic sense for Europe to wait it out and see what happens next, and no doubt it has been a wake-up call to see how quickly the US can pivot from friend to adversary. Once Europe has severed reliance on US, then it is hard to see them reverting.
josefritzishere
This was directly caused by a US regime which can only operate transactionally and cannot itself be trusted. Trust is highly perishable.
everdrive
We're paying a very high cost, but it's not something that regular Americans will notice in their day-to-day lives, which will likely mean that perception of the problem will continue to fall across ideological lines. Either way, we're in an age of decline and fracture.
twirlip
So Putin's failure in Ukraine is balanced by his wild success in the US. The eye-watering corruption of Trump and the Republican Party has irreversibly damaged relations with the democratic allies of the US.
david422
I think the silver lining here is that decentralizing power from America is a good thing, for the world, long term.
petcat
I think the biggest issue is that Europe and the EU has gotten themselves into a position where they don't actually offer much anymore except a pretty good middle class consumer market. They've put themselves into a place where they are just very easy to squeeze, which is what is happening from all sides by Russia, China, and the US. Trump's antics have accelerated that position, and maybe they weren't expecting it from USA, but it was probably inevitable given their long term trajectory.
paulsutter
From the article: > The new year was only three weeks old and President Trump, after removing Venezuela’s autocratic strongman, had briefly threatened to seize Greenland from Denmark. Did Trump threaten to seize Greenland? The WSJ links to an article with the quotes below. The quotes reflect sheer buffoonery (as expected), but so far I haven't seen the threat to seize Greenland. This seems to be the consensus, but its not clear to me that it happened. From the linked article: > During an hourlong speech at the World Economic Forum, the U.S. president said he wouldn’t deploy the military to take control of Greenland. > It was a stark shift in tone for Trump, who just days earlier had declined to rule out using the military to secure ownership of Greenland and posted an image online of the territory with an American flag plastered across it. > “I don’t have to use force,” he said. “I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force.” > “We want a piece of ice for world protection, and they won’t give it,” Trump said of his desire to acquire Greenland from Denmark. “You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no, and we will remember.”
WarmWash
The (ten) trillion dollar question is if Euro nations are going to foster fertile grounds for domestic American/Chinese competitor companies to grow, and at this point, grow rapidly. The second question is if this will be done jointly, or if old lines will come back over not wanting to be encumbered with "dead weight" in the need to move fast.
cmiles8
The challenge for Europe is if it can actually deliver. It’s been highly dependent on the US economically, technically, militarily and otherwise for decades. Posturing on sovereignty has ramped up again but it’s not fundamentally new. A lot of folks would take Europe more seriously if there was more substance behind the talk. If it wants to replace US tech it needs to be competitive with US tech. Today it’s light years off. The US has its own challenges, but it’s ability to unite as a country of independent states is something that Europe is unlikely to match anytime soon and that has a direct impact on the ability to execute everything Europe is posturing about.
Herring
So many people have to get burned before they realize working with a rich sociopath is a bad idea.
patwork
Europe seems to have forgotten that influence is a function of power. The leaders in the article lament their ability to influence the US on policy, but what do they bring to the table to effect that influence? Military power? Economic power? Technical innovation? The only thing they have is a small amount of cultural power that they have used to shame and criticize while entirely relying on US protection.
hsuduebc2
Why is everything today flagged? This is now considered to by the too much political?
tim333
>‘There Is No Going Back’ I figure there will be some going back when Trump goes. He's an unusual president.
tsoukase
Not much will be done: Europe will not manage to become sovereign and independent from the US. Things change slowly and a next Dep POTUS will come again closer to Europe. My opinion, not advice for investment.