The Official DR DOS Website
Tomte
46 points
14 comments
March 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 91.6ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- DOS Zone rglover · 180 pts · May 20, 2026 · 67% similar
- Microsoft open sources DOS 1.00 on 45th anniversary hackthemack · 35 pts · April 30, 2026 · 59% similar
- Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 – and it's more than the code CrankyBear · 12 pts · April 28, 2026 · 55% similar
- GitHub – DOS 1.0: Transcription of Tim Paterson's DOS Printouts s2l · 136 pts · April 29, 2026 · 55% similar
- Continuing the story of early DOS development oldnetguy · 12 pts · April 28, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
Tomte
> DR DOS® 9.0 is a faithful clean-room reimplementation
jmclnx
I was a DR-DOS 6.0 user and it was great, 7.0 seemed to be worse. But by then I had moved to Coherent then Linux when MW closed down. I will need to give DR-DOS a try.
erelong
And then there's PDOS (public domain operating system): https://www.pdos.org/
schoen
I remember a couple of friends using DR DOS in the 1980s. There seemed to be a disagreement about whether to pronounce it as /di ɑɹ/ or "doctor". (I realize it was named after a company and not after a doctor, so the former is more etymologically faithful.) Was there a standard among the creators or the user community?
G3rn0ti
I used Novell DOS 7 back in its day and squeezed > 70 MB on my 50 MB hard disk drive thanks to its Stacker disk compression feature. I remember it coming in a flashy red colored box. It also supported to move most drivers into extended memory to have much more conventional memory available on 386 machines. However, most cutting edge games used DOS protected mode extenders already, so for gaming you couldn’t use that feature. Great times, anyways. ;)