The DeepMind Institute
vertigoruntime
166 points
57 comments
September 16, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 84.0ms across 6,833 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Why I Left Google DeepMind apsec112 · 311 pts · July 15, 2026 · 62% similar
- Our Approach to Bioresilience: Isomorphic Labs and Google DeepMind bookofjoe · 76 pts · July 18, 2026 · 61% similar
- Google DeepMind dismantles AlphaFold team ainch · 49 pts · July 29, 2026 · 60% similar
- I worked at Google DeepMind. You should listen to the warnings about AI gibspaulding · 17 pts · September 15, 2026 · 60% similar
- Why I Left Google DeepMind eatitraw · 188 pts · July 27, 2026 · 60% similar
Discussion Highlights (13 comments)
ipsum2
Tl;DR: It's not a new organization, or non-profit institute. It's a Substack/blog. > DMI is a platform for researchers and thinkers from across Google DeepMind, Google, and the wider global research community to work on and publish creative, deeply informed ideas about a world with AGI. They will not always agree, and they will likely change their minds, as more data and information comes to light at the fast-moving frontier. We created this institute precisely because broad-based intellectual discussion and debate are required to arrive at a consensus about how to address the challenges and opportunities we face as a society.
nsagent
They are simply looking to steer AI policy discussions. It's basically an in-house think tank. It has all the trappings, especially with ominous prognostications like: Today’s AI systems have impressive capabilities and the rapid pace of innovation suggests we’re now approaching artificial general intelligence (AGI), a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities of the human brain. Not sure we are anywhere close to all the cognitive capabilities of the human brain... not even a severely lobotomized one.
0gs
wow i thought the attributions were for the vector graphic things and was like "ok demis is in his illustrator bag too!"
chrisjj
Just a new shop front. Nothing to see here.
ACV001
I wonder if they could make the font even greyer on that website. MORE GREY because I am still able to read it (bearly).
sicktriple
Google citing Mark Fisher was not on my Postmodern-hell-world bingo card.
credit_guy
Here's my opinion on the "pacing the frontier" issue. Recursive self improvement can accelerate AI advances a lot. Whoever nails it first, has a huge first mover's advantage. But OpenAI is taking a "move fast and break things" attitude. This is making life very difficult for Anthropic: how can you retain your edge when you keep measuring twice to cut once, but your competitor keeps blowing things up left and right? Google, who was left a little bit behind anyway, is more than happy to join the calls for taking a more cautious approach to AI development. Hence DeepMind Institute. Sam Altman has no option than to pretend he agrees with all these ideas. What else is he supposed to say?
spyckie2
Their economic policy article is quite good: - need for faster, better and more accurate measurements of the things we care about - 3 scenarios of impact ranging from mild to major disruption - mild policies are all sensible, like expanded unemployment insurance and Earned Income Tax Credit - major disruption policies are also pretty logical, emphasizing owning a share of the profits of AI - AI evaluators to sort and weigh the policies for their effectiveness It looks like to me a lot of thinking, research, and work put into the piece. I know people will gripe at using AI evaluators to score and weigh policies for effectiveness but if you read any amount of research papers, they do researcher evaluated scoring, which translates to "me, a 26 year old PHD candidate who hasn't held a job yet, and my roommate who stayed up all night with me to tell me his vibes on the subject". It is IMO wrong and lazy to dismiss these pieces as being the same level as Dario or Sam's blog posts / speeches / call to actions, these are actual research papers.
etrvic
Does anyone have any idea why most of today’s top links are submitted by the same account, one that is 11 days old?
totallygeeky
Crazy that these labs keep throwing around entirely unsubstantiated claims like "AGI is right around the corner". Given the enormity of the problem I'd argue we're not really any closer than a decade ago, especially given LLM shortcomings.
Kalanos
so glad they spun out a non-profit!
ElProlactin
> Bold thinking on AGI from the lab that pioneered the field. The best part of technology: the people who brought you the "disruption" are the ones who promise you they have the solution to all the problems it caused.
vismit2000
Similarly there is Goldman Sachs Global Institute: https://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/goldman-sachs-global...