Swedish parliament abolishes permanent residence visas for migrants

CGMthrowaway 46 points 75 comments June 15, 2026
www.riksdagen.se · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (8 comments)

euio757

Easy to make a snarky comments at Democrats US who always love to say “Follow the Nordic Model” “Follow Scandinavian countries” on almost every topic... Safe to say they wouldn't agree here. But serious question here: What happened in Sweden that lead to this parliament move?

groos

They can ban immigration from the third world all they want but at some point, they'll have to confront the economic reality of a 1.42/couple fertility rate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Sweden

advisedwang

The UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees Article 34 says: > The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings. Sweden is a signatory and seems to be in non-compliance.

TMWNN

Context: Until very recently, Sweden had no language, income, employment, or skills requirement for citizenship, of which permanent residency was a pathway for. It now , as of 2026, has some basic requirements in these areas. * 2025 citizenship requirements: < https://web.archive.org/web/20250315034218/https://www.migra... > * 2026: < https://www.migrationsverket.se/English/Private-individuals/... > In completely unrelated news, Arabic is now the second most spoken language in Sweden after Swedish. < http://web.archive.org/web/20210511231225/https://digitaledi... >.

cidd

> The Riksdag voted in favour of the Government’s proposal which includes the abolition of permanent residence permits for people in need of protection and people who have been long-term residents in Sweden, as well as their relatives. >The proposal is one component of the efforts to adapt Sweden’s regulatory framework for the granting of international protection and asylum procedures to the minimum guarantees set out in EU law. The purpose of the adaptation is to create better conditions for integration and to reduce social exclusion by reducing asylum-related immigration. Not all route for permanent residence. Only for asylum seekers. Employment or academic based route are still there it seems.

martythemaniak

There's no population or fertility crisis. The world's population isn't going to fall, it'll level off around 2100, nobody old enough to read this will be around, our kids and grandkids can decide for themselves. Local populations will see very different trajectories, yes. Africa will see population growth and many other places will see steep decline. Societies can choose to keep their current system and take in immigrants, or choose to keep their "national character" (or whatever) and rejig their societies so the remaining productive parts pay for increasing numbers of old people. Grifters (Brexiters, MAGA, Le Pen, etc) will attempt to sidestep such obvious tradeoffs, but they will fail, hastening the decline of these societies. So the only crisis we have is people refusing to deal with reality's tradeoffs.

FridayoLeary

The asylum system is being massively abused. It's turning people in the UK into single issue voters.

pembrook

American millennials who grew up fetishizing Europe as a progressive/socialist utopia are in for a rude awakening over the next couple of years. People forget Europe is a collection of literal ethno-states. Europe is in a very dire place economically and anti-immigrant anger is reaching a boiling point in many countries (easier to point fingers at brown people than face up to decades of poor policy choices you yourself voted for). At least Sweden is in relatively "better" shape than its peers. Germany, France, the UK, are also all drinking this cocktail but much worse; fiscally insolvent, unwilling to have kids, unwilling to pivot to new economic models, and scapegoating brown people while staring down the barrel of never-ending benefits cuts and tax increases (which will further kill their economy). This is just the tip of the iceberg. While Americans were ritually flogging themselves for being racist during the 2010s, nobody seemed to bother asking the question "Compared to what?" Well, it turns out in the "progressive utopia" of the Nordics, immigrants face some of the highest rates of job discrimination in the developed world, with Sweden being in the worst group [1]. The US on the other hand is all the way on the other end of the spectrum, almost egalitarian in hiring by comparison. [1] https://sociologicalscience.com/download/vol-6/june/SocSci_v...

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
10,715 stories · 100,765 chunks indexed