Supabase is acquiring Turso
cvburgess
198 points
105 comments
October 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 82.2ms across 8,345 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Some Supabase customers are publicly exposing reams of people's data to the web rvz · 13 pts · September 26, 2026 · 54% similar
- After rewriting SQLite in Rust, Turso turns its sights on Postgres theanonymousone · 12 pts · July 30, 2026 · 47% similar
- Sidero Labs (Talos Linux) Joins Yardi noodlesUK · 15 pts · September 14, 2026 · 41% similar
- Stripe acquires Clerky zakshay · 135 pts · August 26, 2026 · 41% similar
- Show HN: WaveHouse – Supabase for ClickHouse ericandr · 15 pts · August 20, 2026 · 40% similar
Discussion Highlights (19 comments)
jackwsmth
Always been a fan of Supabase, but didn't expect this. Curious to see what comes of it!
theflyingelvis
I use Turso for a small project. Seems to work well. Hope this doesn’t change
vmg12
This is great, I was a little worried that the turso project's future was tied to the success of turso the company and it has impacted a few of my technical choices and has resulted in me choosing sqlite over turso a few times. I'll likely be choosing turso going forward for projects.
kilroy123
UGH as a turso customer, I do not want this.
buckleyourshoe
We use Turso for async in Rust projects. It's performance has been very good. Looking forward to what comes from this
f311a
I hope they will put more resources into fixing issues. I remember there were multiple attempts to add it to ClickBench, but each time new bugs were found. It should not be X times slower than SQLite. https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/issues/336 https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/1009
brainless
I do not feel good about this. I really want SQLite (and the Turso re-write of it) to win for tiny apps that people will build more and more with LLMs. Desktop or server. Even serverless. The core tech is open source so that is good. Will it stay? I guess Turso hosting was not making enough revenue?
rvz
Open source never pays the bills, nor do users here ever pay for open source.
lpgauth
Congrats Glauber!
popalchemist
I feel like this makes a lot of sense and is a rare win-win-win (supabase-turso-customers being the parties).
FLeXMurphy
it's glommer
arnath
Why would you rewrite something that’s widely considered one of the best written and tested pieces of software in the world?
mhalikosen
Hayırlı olsun
integrallis
Supabase is a great product, we use it for all of our products, but we also need OSS solutions that can be self-hosted. For Supabase, I hope the platform improves. SQLite has become the standard, we need that standard (other than the SQL93 part) to be created and maintained so that other can drop a paid for product and handle the server-side themselves is the choose to.
mhalikosen
I didn't know the company, but it turns out they have a great mindset.
polyterative
Could be fun.made product on top of it.Pro plan is still too much, but free quota is too little.having a hard time balancing my hobby project.Still there's not really many alternatives, so probably we'll stick with it.Decent service.
orliesaurus
Any guesses on how much they paid?
bel8
GGs to the team! I'm a big fan of Glauber's work. He gives me the same neo-hacker vibe as Jarred, of Bun. So this is pleasant news to me.
patrick_rtk
nide for a rust project !