Starlink Signal Leakage Threatens Radio Astronomy's Most Critical Frequencies
upofadown
86 points
50 comments
September 12, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 67.6ms across 6,278 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Space mirrors could ruin astronomy — and your eyes Brajeshwar · 13 pts · August 10, 2026 · 56% similar
- 'Starwashing': The new space race has an environmental problem speckx · 11 pts · September 03, 2026 · 48% similar
- SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth CrankyBear · 136 pts · July 10, 2026 · 47% similar
- Starlink exempted from FCC ban on foreign-made routers logickkk1 · 17 pts · July 28, 2026 · 47% similar
- Satellite Tracker – Live Map of Starlink and 30k Satellites rolph · 53 pts · July 14, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
electric_mayhem
That’s a mighty nice field of study you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it
spdustin
I just have to say: I _hate_ with a white-hot fury the growing usage of html-load and error-report dot com bullshit on these sites. I block those domains for gratuitous ad-serving, and sites just cycle a modal error now. (I know, I could disable JavaScript everywhere and enable it on a site-by-site basis. Maybe that time has come.)
RockRobotRock
maybe Internet for people on earth matters more than astronomy
robryan
> Algorithmic mitigation is being explored, but scientists describe it as “embryonic” — potentially demanding computing power that rivals the science processing itself. It sounds like this would work? Just be more costly, at least in the short term. > Engineering fixes are the real answer What is the fix and tradeoff? The article doesn't seem to cover it at all.
ccamrobertson
While I pine for a dark sky, it makes sense that these operations should move in the same way century old optical telescopes in cities are no longer used for cutting edge science. The far side of the moon seems like an increasingly viable option.
moeffju
I realize this is off topic, but why do people use Claude of all models to write these, when its style is so obvious and so grating? I just immediately hit Back on the first Claudism.